GoTo: MY OTHER SITE ABOUT
THE MEN AND WOMEN HOLDING
POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY IN
THE HOAX GOVERNMENTS OF CANADA
AND THE IMPOSTOR CROWN OF CANADA
ARE COMMITTING HIGH TREASON
AGAINST THE CANADIAN PEOPLE
Posted: March 1st, 2002
Latest update: Nov 30, 2007
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the USA Declaration
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
is obvious that Jefferson gained his inspiration from:
Declaration of Rights (June 12, 1776) Drafted by: George Mason
I: That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have
certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of
society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their
posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of
acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness
should be noted here that the primary unalienable (meaning: a value
cannot be ascertained) right is 'life'. The secondary unalienable
rights are 'property' and 'liberty'. 'Property' is absolutely necessary
for the maintenance of life - the maintenance of one's body. 'Liberty'
is absolutely necessary to take one's produce to market - to travel to
one's place of work where labour, the primary property, may be
exchanged for the necessary property to maintain life - food, shelter
'Pursuit of Happiness' (Hope of Happiness) is vital for one's mental
and physical health.
that Jefferson 'conveniently' left the property right out of the
Declaration of Independence. Modern charters of rights use the term
'security of person'.
'person' is a legal status (corporate slave status) attached to one's
body, the statement is meaningless relative to rights.
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed,
II: That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the
people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all
times amenable to them.
III: That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community;
of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is
capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is
most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and
that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to
these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable,
unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in
such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it
is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing
its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect
their Safety and Happiness.
indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be
changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience
hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are
sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which
they are accustomed.
when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism,
it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and
to provide new Guards for their future security.
Conclusion drawn from the above quote:
1. We, the People are creations of God - NOT
creations of government.
From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:
2. The RIGHTS of LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and
the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS are bestowed upon us by our Creator - NOT by
3. We, the People create government and
install kings, queens, prime ministers or presidents as our servant.
4. As creator of government, we are the
"MAJESTY", and government is our servant.
When the men and women, acting as members of a SERVANT government,
scheme to overthrow the "MAJESTY" of the MASTER and subjugate or
destroy the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, there exists the crime of HIGH TREASON.
The Canadian People have NOT had one iota of opportunity to participate
in deciding whether we will have the Monarch of Great Britain as the
Crown of Canada, what form of government we will have in Canada, or any
opportunity to write or ratify a constitution.
treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.
may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote
not only offenses against the king and government, but also
accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a
confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there
subsists a natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the
inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty,
subjugation, and allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.
disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction,
high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the
treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If
indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate
into arbitrary power.
The Treasonous Acts Against Canadians
Canadian Governments, at all levels, by use of a "STRAWMAN", a sound
alike name of the name by which you have been called all your life, but
usually spelled in all capital letters or family name first, and called
a "PERSON". The deceit is in the government's (Crown) making the family
name as the paramount name, a "surname", where the root word "sur"
means over, above, primary, and the given name(s) as a reference name.
This is opposite to the intentions of one's parents, and opposite of
the origin and status of a "family" name - that being a reference name
for the primary, or given names. That fraudulent name is then inscribed
on a government money value instrument called a 'birth certificate'. In
one's using/acknowledging the birth certificate name as being "one and
the same" as oneself, that fraud intended name, it carries with its
use, the status of 'plantation slave'.
'all caps' spelling is a code signifying that the slave has been
pledged as a debtor in the bankruptcy of the Crown. All western nations
were declared bankrupt in 1930. The deceit by government in teaching
people to use the birth certificate name through the educational system
makes all Canadians SUBJECT to the CROWN by changing our status to that
of a FEUDAL SERF of the MIDDLE AGES. For several hundred years, the
British Monarchy bestowed 'privileges' (falsely called rights) on
'subjects' (sometimes called 'citizens'), but this ceased with the 1930
that time, these 'privileges', including 'due process of law' has been
slowly removed, and the 'slaves' have been subjected to increased
forced extraction of their labour and life (life is time spent) by way
of taxation and inflation of fiat counterfeit money. This is how people
have been deprived of the protections of such documents as the Magna
Carta 1225, the Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights, The Petition of
Rights, and more recently, Diefenbaker's Canadian Bill of Rights.
Romans had an expression for disobedient slaves, called "homo sacer",
where the disobedient slave was deprived of all rights of due process
of law. The disobedient slave could be murdered at will by "officers of
Caesar" without any reprisal, just as modern police can murder people
with their guns or tasers without fear of criminal justice, based upon
their own testimony of right.
is a deliberate act of HIGH TREASON against the People of Canada, as it
results in the loss of the Creator bestowed rights of LIFE, LIBERTY and
PROPERTY, and the right to a common law court (due process of law).
Elizabeth II has allowed her name to be prostituted to this evil scheme
in direct violation of her oath of office as Monarch of the British
Commonwealth of Nations. In her oath, she swore on the Holy Bible that
she would uphold and defend the rights of the People over which she
reigns as Monarch.
is a question as to whether the Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland has any right to be called the Monarch or the Crown
of Canada, as the right to succession in the BNA Act (section 2)
granted to the successors and heirs of Queen Victoria was struck by the
British Imperial Parliament in 1893.
claim of absolute sovereignty rights by the English Monarchy was shown
to be non-existent in the Magna Carta of 1215. [Actually 1225, as the
1215 Magna Carta was voided by the Pope.] Yet, over PERSONS, be they
natural persons (man under contract of servitude with the Crown, and
without right of free will - except for obedience) or artificial
corporate bodies, as created by the Crown, there is absolute rights of
the MASTER over the servant exhibited by the Crown over the People.
Crown, whether it be in so-called right of Canada or of a province, by
deviously changing our status before their corrupt courts as being
corporate members created by the Crown, has deprived us of our lawful
courts and plundered our lives which have been expended in labour to
obtain the very necessities of life.
ALL cases in a court in Canada, where Canadians are taken to court for
disobedience to a statute, or regulation therein, they are considered a
'CORPORATE ENTITY/NATURAL PERSON/MEMBER'. This fact is an unknown to
most Canadians. People believe that they are dealing directly with the
Canadian Justice system as a full liability man or woman with full
has been under the Roman system since King John signed over England
FOREVER as a vassal state to the Holy Roman Empire/Pontiff/Vatican in
1213. All human institutions are make-believe ships/incorporations in
the Roman system. Thus, All corporations and corporate (crew)members
are a legal fiction, and are SUBJECTS of the Crown. The British Crown
is subject to, or under the Crown of the City of London, the Vatican
owned financial, legal and professional controls capitol of the Holy
Roman Empire. So, the Crown referred to in Canada is most likely the 6
pointed City of London Crown (a corporation), not the British Crown.
The Canadian people have a basic RIGHT to Common Law , and as such, are
NOT SUBJECTS of the Crown for the imposition of corporate
ADMINISTRATIVE Law - the ONLY type of law which is found in the
Canadian Court system. This subterfuge is totally in the realm of legal
sleaze and trickery for the purpose of denying your God Given RIGHTS.
using the term "Common Law", I refer to the Anglo-Saxon Common Law. The
English Monarchy began the defrauding of the English people of their
individual rights protecting Anglo-Saxon Common Law in a concerted
effort by King Edward I in conspiracy with the Pope of Rome sometime
around 1300 AD. The term "common law" and "English common law" was
concocted as a fraud; and, is in fact, a system derived directly from
Roman civil law - commonly called "dictator's law". As Roman Municipal
Law, it points to Mercantile Law used against debtors, as 'municipal'
means a debtor territory. Considering that Anglo-Saxon Common Law
period of England preceded the Norman Conquest of England by some 500
years, we have evidence of this fraud posted on the Canadian Federal Justice website:
"The common law, which
developed in Great Britain after the Norman Conquest,
was based on the decisions of judges in the royal courts. It is called
judge-made law because it is a system of rules based on "precedent".
Whenever a judge makes a decision that is to be legally enforced, this
decision becomes a precedent: a rule that will guide judges in making
subsequent decisions in similar cases. The common law is unique in the
world because it cannot be found in any "code" or "legislation"; it
exists only in past decisions. However, this also makes it flexible and
adaptable to changing circumstances."
primary feature of Roman Municipal Law, a variation of Roman Civil Law,
[derived from Maritime Law], used by the deceitful English Monarchy,
and it's so-called justice system, was/is the "notwithstanding clause".
The Monarchy called this 'Equity'. This clause derives from the fact
that Roman Law is based upon all commercial and political
organizations, in fact all human institutions, being make-believe
'ship's orders' - laws, rules and regulations concerning the ship, have
within them the necessary right and duty of the captain to disregard
any such rules or regulations when he deems it necessary for the 'good'
of the ship. The complete "flexible and adaptable" feature of so-called
English or British common law is nothing more than the common usage of
the notwithstanding clause to insure that the Crown's pleasures,
prerogatives and privileges come before the individual rights of the
Paine (1737-1809), the great American philosopher of man's individual
rights and freedoms, wrote in his book Rights Of Man (page 218):
"Government by precedent, without any regard to the principle of the
precedent, is one of the vilest systems that can be set up." In
Paine's day, government's primary reason for existence was the justice
We can see how "flexible and adaptable" this
fraudulent English common law is by the way Canadian and American
judges use the Anti-Government Movement Guide Book
to institute treasonous actions against Canadians (and Americans, as
the case may be) when people use unalienable rights or statute and/or
constitutional law to defend themselves against government extortion
So, What is my
understanding regarding the nature of Anglo-Saxon Common Law?
Anglo-Saxon Law had no Statutes, Acts, Rules, Regulations, Edicts,
Precedents or Magistrates[Judges]. There was only ONE Law - "Do not
unto others as you would not have others do unto you." A sheriff was
administrator for keeping the peace, and jury assembly. He was then
enforcer of jury decisions. The jury was selected from the community of
other free will men [peers = equal in status]. The jury decided whether
the accused, [or the accuser] was using his/her free will in a moral
manner, basing their decision solely on the Golden Rule - God's Law.
The assembled jury appointed a foreman as the speaker and administrator.
the above quote from the 1893 Dictionary of Law states: "High treason
is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate,
this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary
bodies politic, are corporations wherein men in administrative
positions supposedly have protection against the actions they do by the
"corporate veil". All corporations are "make-believe" ships, based upon
the Roman Empire system, which itself was based upon the ancient
Persian model whereby the ship was the entity, and the men on board as
crewmembers were non-volitional (non-free-will minded) body parts with
only the duty to obey the captain's orders.
this make-believe corporate veil protection to do as they please is
only a fictional game. Men (and women) who do damage to another while
in a contract (oath of office) to be a servant to the People are full
liable for their unlawful actions when it entails HIGH TREASON. The
PENALTY for HIGH TREASON is DEATH BY HANGING - and that penalty is
still in effect in Canada.
In the USA Supreme Court records, we find:
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not
have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of
U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct.
471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980);
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264,
404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
What's To Be Done??
I would suggest reading a Discourse on Voluntary Servitude
written by Éttiene de la
Boétie of France around 1560.
To learn about legal rights of which you
Eldon G. Warman
#2 attachment at the bottom of this article)
the facts about the Vatican's and British Crown's continued claimed
ownership of the USA; and, their continued collection of 'tribute' from
Americans through the Pope's 'Holy Roman Empire'.
#3 attachment at the bottom of this article)
Additional, and VERY IMPORTANT information on this
topic is available through LINKS at the end of PART THIRTEEN.
of the writers of the Constitution thought it was a little too
restrictive. It was generally conceded, for instance, that the people
had the right to bear arms, but they also knew that if we ever were
placed or allowed ourselves to be brought under Maritime Admiralty Law
concerning our persons and property, we would have dire need of a
guarantee for our rights -- thus, the ten amendments were added to the
Constitution, and that became the substantive part of the Constitution.
Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution defines the Maritime
have we been tricked out of our Common Law rights; and, into the
Admiralty courts? How has equity as well as Admiralty been corrupted?
How has the Federal Government made it almost impossible for us to
receive our constitutional rights -- our substantive rights in the
to understand the Constitution -- we must examine the Declaration of
Independence and those 56 men who signed it, and pledged their lives,
liberty, family, property, and their honor to this sacred trust. All of
these men were very knowledgeable and learned in the Common Law -- they
knew the law because they studied the law, they may not have had a high
school education (many of them). But they could read, and they read and
studied law. They were men of the age of reason and they knew and they
understood. They knew exactly what the king was doing. They knew the
is a very important thing. And, as James Madison wrote years ago:
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be
their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge
gives." Education should never be terminal! The First Amendment to the
US Constitution cites "Freedom of Religion" that in actual fact is
"Freedom of Education" since the church controlled education, at the
time of its writing.
there is a chronological sequence of events that placed us where we are
today. We can almost assure you that you will reject, or want to
reject, parts of what you are about to see and hear. There is a theory
known as the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (TCD) that holds that the
mind involuntarily rejects information not in line with previous
thoughts and/or actions. Brace yourself, the following message may be
entirely different from anything you heretofore believed to be true. If
you are unaware, you are unaware of being unaware!
Have You Been Hornswoggled?
About the author:
Richard McDonald is a California Citizen domiciled in The California
state Republic. He does legal research and has his own site on the web,
Citizens Forum File area. hornswog.htm
THE UNITED STATES
IS STILL A
TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
Comments On "Hoover Planned Massive Arrests"
The Hoover agenda is but a glimpse and fractal of an overall and much
greater “Plan”, to be implemented over a long-period of time over
multiple generations of the People of the planet and the nations
thereof. Titles 26 and 18 are judicially implemented through
28; the Federal Magistrate Act is key, as well, because it is
a Federal Magistrate, having only the ‘law authority’ of a federal park
ranger [who can deal with only infractions of violations of federal law
on federal lands legally owned and/or ceded to the “United States”],
that is enjoined to contract on charging instruments, ie. Affidavits of
Cause and Application for Search Warrant, tendered [commercial
by real men acting as ’agents’ of/for the fiction ‘government’ to
make, grant, and issue Search Warrants, which are then to be delivered
[commercial term] or ‘served’ [legal term] on the target
same is true of Arrest Warrants. All are brought against
the United States’ when involving anyone within the continental limit
of the 48 states of the United States of America who was born on the
land of one of said states. As a matter of law and jurisdiction,
‘states’ are deemed to be distinct, diverse, and outside the
territorial [jurisdiction] limits of the federal United States, ie.
District of Columbia, and are not federal territories under exclusive
territorial legislative control [regulation] of Congress or the
above attachments are taken from a recent  Supreme Court case,
filed on behalf of a number of federal inmates, who’s federal judgments
and incarcerations are all brought under alleged authority of the
Constitution and the federal Statutes at Title 18. Conclusive
had been done over a period of six years by those who were instrumental
in bringing the subject matter of the action forward. Their
conclusions are verified and certified by the Clerk of the National
Archive and Clerk of Congress, and fully establish that Title 18 was
never lawfully enacted on June 25, 1948, which also implies that Titles
3, 28, and the Federal Magistrate Act were not as well. The
Archive documents of the legislative proceedings were included in this
action for certain relief. The Supreme Court just recently
the action, refusing to hear the case, and dismissed it, without any
written findings of fact or conclusions of law, which is at the
‘discretion’ of the court not to do so. The case may be dead, but
subject matter is not.
conversion of the lawful American people of the several republic
states, being ‘non-resident aliens’ to the District of Columbia, into
corporate ‘citizens of the United States’, within the District of
Columbia, as ‘U.S. persons’ or ‘personnel’, ‘res idents of the United
States’, who then become corporate FRANCHISE TRUST ‘taxpayers’, deemed
to be engaged in an excise taxable privileged [regulated] activity of a
‘trade or business’ in the “performance of a public office or official
duty’ is what Title 5 was in-part intended to lay the groundwork
Americans had to be converted and reclassified under regime of “law
authority”, to be brought under or harnessed under the emerging regime
of administrative [socialist-fascist] ‘law’, which itself was/is
brought about by the declared emergency of 1933 and subsequent
Executive, Legislative, and Judicial measures in support thereof.
is also of subtle significance as related to the “Plan” and the
architects of it, who act through U.S. hegemony and superiority as the
last ‘super power’, is the recent passing of the Military Commissions
Act: See below and take note that the Bill # is 6166, the same
as the draconian E.O. 6166, June 10, 1933:
H R 6166 RECORDED
VOTE 27-Sep-2006 4:45
TITLE: Military Commissions Act
friend of mine who is a Biblical researcher shared some recently
disclosed information originating with some Biblical scholars recently
reporting to the effect that the ‘number of the BEAST’ was/is not in
fact “666”, but was wrongly mis-interpreted and is in fact
6166 is the actual [military-executive] Order which created the current
fascist STATE. And, House Resolution (HR) 6166 is the Act that
redefines and expands the presumed ‘law authority’ of the fascists, and
reiterates E.O. 6166 of June 10, 1933..
‘legislation’, if passed, will put the perverbial ‘nail’ in the coffin
of the People and the Republic.
Both E.O. 6166 and HR 6166 go to Senate Document 43, 1933 and HJR-192
of June 5, 1933, now rescinded, but still acting under full force and
effect as “public policy” and “public interest” within the “PUBLIC
order for any legislative act of Congress to bear on any real man or
woman of any American state, ‘they’ had to first convert the
the states into legislatively controlled and fictionalized ‘persons’
having the same status as a COMMERCIAL FRANCHISE or corporation under
presumed exclusive jurisdiction and authority of U.S.
municipal-territorial commutarian contract “law” [in admiralty-maritime
venue]. Hence, the bankruptcy of 1933 was not a move to subjugate
usurp the alleged ‘states’ of the Union Republic, but to subjugate by
inducement, misrepresentation, extreme duress, and obfuscation of
material facts, the American People, who’s energy and capacity
needed for all kinds of nefarious purposes besides ‘payment of the
public debt. It was a concerted programmatic move to usurp the
and standing of the People under the Laws of Nature and God, on the
Land, and to circumvent and controvert any of their Rights under the
BILL OF RIGHTS, within the organic Constitution for the united States
of America. All of this still operating under force of
known as the “FEDERAL CORPORATION”, sited in the District of Columbia,
which itself is controlled fully by private foreign and domestic