casper25 - fw10 - RMN-shariah - icke/faked-moon-landing - Kingston drama -

dimanche 26 juillet 2009 01 h 07
Afficher les détails du contact
À:,,,,, "benjamin fulford" <>, "christopher story" <>,, Ken6@Ken-Welch.Com... suite
casper25 - fw10 - RMN-shariah - icke/faked-moon-landing -  Kingston drama -
casper july-25-09
After last weekends disclosure that the World Court was once again set to screw us and their Representative had accepted a bribe of 2 B from OBAMA
 silence prevailed, unless you consider the daily ABC Hell Storm news?
WE knew something was not right as the blackout extended worldwide with emphasis on CHINA. Not only were our calls blocked more intensely than ever before but even calls among CASPER TEAMMATES were being blocked. In a single day 27 calls between us were blocked, 15 outgoing and 12 incoming. Recall that the bribe was paid in advance
and its disclosure caused quite a ruckus WE hear.
By Thursday WE were hearing that some FREEDOM packs had been delivered and accessed. WE were able to confirm a couple of them leading to further investigation which exposed some 40 FREEDOM deliveries over the past four weeks. ALL were to major supporters of OBAMA WE learned.
WE have subsequently learned certain MING who are also CHINESE MAFIA, have been funding OBAMA personally since long before he became President. While OBAMA was at the G-8 their leader, the dead one, was at the U.S. Treasury. Over the years this Wing of the MING has given or loaned OBAMA and the U.S. so much money they are now near the end of their financial rope.
 "THE DEAD ONE", as WE now refer to him, representing the MING, the CHINESE MAFIA and Dr. LI, along with the CHICAGO MAFIA, have been funding OBAMA all along with the primary motive being, from the MING perspective, to convert the U.S. to COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM/CENTRAL CONTROL over America. From where else could this news have come except from the "insiders" in CHINA itself?
Eventually one of the forty ran his mouth confirming that aspect of these disclosures. They are, as a general statement, the largest participants in Freedom.Those receiving these packages were/are also on board with OBAMA'S takeover of America. Access to these packages which was occurring as they were received over the last four weeks was made possible by the combined efforts of OBAMA, Dr. LI, and "The Dead One" which also brought the Ming and the Chinese Mafia into it as that is who they are. AND Treasury, the OBAMA/GEITHNER TREASURY. WE have many of these names and are working to acquire the rest at which time all of them will be released at once.
 This same group, leading several others, has also been propping up OBAMA via their ongoing acquisition of new issue Treasury Debt Instruments. Over the last ten years these MING have squandered assets accumulated over more than 100 years. OBAMA was to "re-supply" their lost funds from the theft of our program funds, but again,
 the primary objective was to support OBAMA'S conversion of America to COMMUNISM.
Remember the expected "JULY 4TH SURPRISE"? Because the FREEDOM CONTRACT calls for announcements and the unveiling of "The Suitcase" upon delivery of a single Freedom Pack, and because deliveries to the 40 were taking place, the "surprise" was to be all deliveries, the announcements, disclosure and exposure. All was blocked because only OBAMA'S henchmen got secret deliveries which no one knew about    till now.
The above disbursements DID NOT COME FROM THE PROGRAM FUNDS.
 They were provided by MING, LI and "THE DEAD ONE".
WE hear the WORLD COURT has been or is in the process of being "disbanded" due to ongoing corruption. This news also comes to us from overseas.
In spite of the above WE hear deliveries are again due at any moment which means the good guys are aware of and are cleaning up the mess reported above.
 WE hear Announcements and The Suitcase will follow immediately as previously scheduled.
Any decent Journalist could write a very big book about OBAMA corruption which has already occurred during his first six months in office.
ACORN for example, has been indicted for voter fraud in nine states, has already been given 50 million plus by OBAMA, is scheduled to receive BILLIONS more from the "stimulus money" and has been "punished" by being moved into the White House". There are a dozen other such scandals underway simultaneously all being hidden from the people by the bought and paid for Main Street Media.
Unless the American people wake up now, right now, you can kiss this Country, its historical values and its Founding Documents good bye. Every * kool-aid drinker* out there must force some black coffee down their own throats
or be willing to accept responsibility for the destruction of our beloved Country. 
               casper   7-25-09
all of casper:
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité – Providence, Miracle or What Really Happened
Politics / US Politics Jul 24, 2009 - 01:10 AM
By: Robert_Singer
ArticleWarning: Reading the following may be hazardous to your mental health. The material herein has caused readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD).  CD is the discomfort felt at the discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held belief system – It’s that queasy feeling that rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T BELIEVE THAT! Because, if you accepted the new information, you would have to admit you been ”had,” or ”conned,” in this case into shopping for stuff to trash the planet. ...(...)  and fw10
Steve Emerson: Chicago: Shariah Takes Precedence over U.S. Constitution - Imam Will Fight "Until Islam Becomes Victorio
Posted By: watcher51445 <Send E-Mail>
Date: Saturday, 25-Jul-2009 06:46:54
        For those of our valued readers who do not know about a "Caliphate" here is a fair description [vkd]
        July 21, 2009
        Chicago: Shariah Takes Precedence over U.S. Constitution - Imam Will Fight "Until Islam Becomes Victorious or We Die in the Attempt"
        Steve Emerson
        Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT), the international movement to re-establish an international Islamic state ­ or Caliphate, kicked off a new campaign to win American recruits Sunday afternoon in this Chicago suburb. Nearly 300 people packed the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel for its Khalifah Conference on "The Fall of Capitalism and the Rise of Islam" to listen to listen to HT
        ideologues blame capitalism for World War I and World War II; the U.S. subprime mortgage meltdown; the current violence in Iraq and Afghanistan; world poverty and malnutrition and inner-city drug use.
        A speaker identified as Abu Atallah even blamed capitalism for the late singer Michael Jackson's decision "to shed his black skin."Hizb ut-Tahrir aims to restore the Caliphate that existed during the Ottoman Empire in Turkey. Turkish leader Kemal Ataturk abolished it in 1924 in an effort to create a secular, Europeanized state.
        Security at the conference was very tight. Oak Lawn police maintained a checkpoint outside the Hilton, and local police and HT's own security people had a substantial presence inside the hotel. In the ballroom where the conference took place, men and women were largely segregated, with men in the front and women in the back. This became a significant point of contention between HT supporters and several members of the audience who objected to this arrangement. At one point, an unidentified Hizb ut-Tahrir speaker became flustered over this line of questioning."Men and women," he blurted out, must be kept separate "to prevent people
        from behaving like animals."
        A woman in the audience responded: "How does intermingling between men and women make you animals?" HT panelists didn'thave a persuasive answer, and soon adjourned that session.The conference was sometimes poorly organized. There was no list of   speakers, forcing reporters to sometimes guess at the spelling of speakers' names. But HT certainly appeared to be serious about working for the larger goals of the conference: abolishing capitalism and imposing Caliphate rule over the world. According to Hizb ut-Tahrir, the world's social and economic problems will not be fixed until the world is governed by Shariah and the government controls all major industries. Lenders would no longer be able to charge interest, which one speaker decried as a "poisonous concept."
A speaker identified by conference organizers as Imam Jaleel Abdul Razek said that "if they offer us the sun, or the moon, or a nice raise, or a passport, or a house in the suburbs or even a place to pray at the job, on the condition that we stop calling for Islam as a complete way of life - we should never do that, ever do that - unless and until Islam becomes victorious or we die in the attempt." (To see the clip, click here.)
Later, the following dialogue ensued between the imam and a member of the audience over whether Shariah or the Constitution should be the supreme law of the land in the United States (click here to see the clip):Audience member: "Would you get rid of theConstitution for Shariah, yes or no?"Imam: "Over the Muslim world? Yes, it would be gone."
Audience Member: And so if the United States was a Muslim world, the Constitution would be gone?"Imam: "If the United States was in the Muslim world, the Muslims who are here would be calling and happy to see the Shariah applied, yes we would."
Audience Member: "And the Constitution gone. That's all."
Imam: "Yes, as Muslims they would be long gone."
While Hizb ut-Tahrir's controversial message attracted demonstrators and some media attention, the group at least is open about its ambitions. It not only is determined to destroy capitalism -- it would shred the United States Constitution as well in favor of Shariah law. Contributing Editor Steven Emerson is an internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security and heads the Investigative Project on Terrorism. This article originally appeared on the Hudson Institute website.
The "Cold War" -- $5 Trillion Illuminati Boondoggle 
     July 23, 2009 Henry Makow Ph.D.
mullins.jpg // Eustace Mullins  picture:
  The drawback of denying mankind is controlled by a Satanic cult is that the Illuminati will continue to degrade, slaughter and bankrupt humanity until it is sucked dry.
Because they got away with the First and Second World Wars, we had the "Cold War." Because they got away with that, we had 9-11,  the credit crunch and swine flu. If we don't stop them, what will they do next?
In a 1996 Essay "The $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax"(( )) , Eustace Mullins reveals how the Illuminati bankers routinely dupe us on a grand scale:
"For more than four decades, the American people have been terrorized, not by a foreign threat, but by their own government.  In order for the continue to loot the nation after the successful conclusion of the Second World War, they had to invent a new threat...Today (1996) we are burdened by a $5 trillion national debt. Coincidentally that is the amount we have spent on "national defense" since 1945."
After working with the USSR to defeat the Nazis, the Russians were suddenly recast as arch villains. Nothing less than the survival of Western Civilization was at stake. "We're going to have to scare the hell out of the country," Senator Vandenberg said, and they did. First with the threat of imminent nuclear annihilation (remember the backyard bomb shelter?) and later with false CIA evidence that the USSR was a formidable menace. In fact, Russia was a third world country dependent on covert aid from the West.
After deeding Eastern Europe to Stalin at Yalta, Winston Churchill kicked off the "Cold War" with his famous "Iron Curtain" speech in 1946. According to Mullins, Stalin took his instructions from Averell Harriman who spent 1944 & 1945 at Stalin's Kremlin headquarters.  (This Illuminati fixer had spent the pre-war years building up Hitler's war machine.) Stalin welcomed the external enemy to keep his own people in line.
The Cold War was sustained by the American doctrine of "containment" rather than opposition to Communism. This was defined by Freemason George Kennan. His father "Kosuth" was named after a Masonic Hungarian revolutionary. His namesake, his grandfather's cousin, was Jacob Schiff's agent and helped finance the Russian revolution.
What better way to dispose of someone than to make him accomplice in his own murder? Americans will continue to commit suicide if we allow the bankers to buy our complicity with our own money.  Throughout history, these bankers have used debt to despoil and enslave individuals and nations.
How long are "respectable" people going to deny this diabolical conspiracy exists? How long are they going to betray their countrymen and civilization? Here is Hillary Clinton saying in so many words she gets her instructions and learns "how to think" from "the mother ship" -- the Rothschild-Rockefeller (Illuminati banker) -sponsored Council on Foreign Relations.
How long will we accept the charade of democracy?  How long will we be bribed? The Protocols of the Elders of Zion  describe the current situation:
The masses "are accustomed to listen to us who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way, we shall create a blind force which shall never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents...The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits." (Protocol 10)
"We have already contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities...they all come near...looking through the spectacles we set astride their noses." ( Protocol 12.)
We hope that by remaining in denial about Masonic subversion, somehow we will be spared. If the past is any indication, the opposite is true.
What can we do? The media is silent about world government. The responsibility of people who are aware of the truth is to alert our neighbors. Host parties. Show videos. Organize meetings. We need to educate and arouse opposition. There is strength in numbers and as conditions deteriorate, people will flock to our banner.
Related: "The Serving Armies of the Standing Bankers" LES VISIBLE
"The NWO is the International Banking Cartel"
(( Pyramid-of-control and 
The Curse Of Canaan: A Demonology Of History by Eustace Mullins
Murder By Injection: The Story Of The Medical Conspiracy Against America by E. Mullins
Rape Of Justice America's Tribunals Exposed    by Eustace Mullins
Secrets Of The Federal Reserve                        by Eustace Mullins
[1984] The World Order Our Secret Ruler           by Eustace Mullins
Education for Slavery                                       by Eustace Mullins, Staunton, Va. 24401
My Life in Christ,
This Difficult Individual Ezra Pound
from //// vaccine critics
See more critics: AIDS  Allopathy  Cell phone  Cancer  Dental Dope Inc  Holocaust Psychiatry   Smallpox Vaccination Vivisection   ))
and the comments......

SK said (July 24, 2009):
What can we do? The media is silent about world government. The responsibility of people who are aware of the truth is to alert our neighbors. Host parties. Show videos. Organize meetings. We need to educate and arouse opposition. There is strength in numbers and as conditions deteriorate, people will flock to our banner.
All I'm trying to expose Illuminati and their malevolent agenda. I've wrote few articles about Marranos who worship mammon.
Protocols of Zion: Mankind Death Wish. Democracy is a rUSe. God and Mammon. Obamageddon vs. Osamageddon.
(( ))  guY-sir, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Richard said (July 24, 2009):
Henry: Ignorance, is the best way to keep people totally under control. As you already know, it is estimated that about 80% to 85% of the population, lives in total "darkness". They are way too busy just trying to survive, pay for their "little toys" "they" manufactured for us and a weekly basis to keep us "HAPPY". When you talk to someone about the current economic crisis, unemployment, illegals invading the Country from the south, low wages, crime, insecurity. You about to lose your home or already lost it, you get a "pink" slip from work, your wife just filed for divorce and your 16 years old daughter hates you, because you didn't buy her a car for her birthday, the last thing you are worry about is the Illuminati, the Masonic subversion and all the corrupt and GREEDY bas...tards taking over the world. Your main and ONLY concern, is to make it through the day. This IS precisely the way it was design, to keep us "busy" while they do their filthy and diabolical work. The media? the are in it with them.It's a hopeless world Henry.
Bob said (July 24, 2009):
Dr. Makow, it seems that people are happy in their comas. When trying to pass this message along to "good" people I am met with anger, ridicule and harassment. Even my closest loved ones, people who would trust me on any
other critical issue in their lives, meet my pleas with glazed over eyes. Almost as if they have been pre programmed to switch off when faced with certain queries.
They seem beyond skeptical, especially in regards to the Satanic ties of this criminal organization. Perhaps my methods
are wrong, yet the evidence screams for itself.
Everyone has Eyes Wide Shut.
Thank you for your thoughts and energy Dr. Makow, please know it is highly appreciated.//
---an Bob:
It is a gradual process. Remember people have been brainwashed and their conditioning is enforced every day by the media. The important thing is not to preach or appear eager to convince them. Just make your position known and throw out a disturbing fact. Like--"Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC admitted that WTC-7, a 47 story building, was demolished on 9-11. Why was it wired for demolition?"
Behave like you are in possession of superior knowledge (you are) and let them come to you. Ignore the others letting sleeping dogs lie.
Dave said (July 24, 2009):
As always, a great article on the Cold war, and I appreciate your effort to inform, and hope that the coming world events will not leave you discouraged.
The phrase: “What’s next?” Is a good question to consider, but not one that can be altered if discovered. As much as I love the honest, good hearts of common folks in this world, I understand the Illuminati well enough to know that their agenda cannot be changed, and I hope that most of us will take the struggle where it belongs, in the heart.
One cannot fight the forces of evil that empower the bankers and the globalists bent on our destruction, because they are human shells providing refuge for demonic enterprise.
Therefore, if one host is compromised, another will be found, and the band keeps marching. As disappointing as this concept may be, history cannot deny this influence, that moves from one generation to another, conquering everything in it’s path.
Hence, the battleground should never be waged in terms of the flesh, but contested in the hearts of each of us. Unfortunately, most hearts find evil so appealing, that ways are found to validate and support the exploits of evil.
In truth, mankind does not want to change their ways, and the minions of evil move forward with confidence. Everyone wants salvation, but not a God to rule over them, and as a result, will barter for the god of their choosing.
Last, what is next is really dependent upon the treasures of the heart, and what is lost, is based upon what one covets the most.
Once the creatures identify this hidden spot in the heart, forces will come to rob, steal and plunder. But if one is looking for a specific event that has an impact to global conditions, then I would suggest that one consider the nation of Israel and it’s current struggle with peace. .....(.....)
Thursday, July 23, 2009
The International Banking Cartel is the New World Order
My belief in the existence of the New World Order centers around the activities, actions and writings of the members of the elite (mostly Anglo-American) inside the international banking cartel - which of course includes the Rockefeller and Rothschild families – over roughly the last century.
This cartel, through their financing of two World Wars; the revolutions of Lenin/Stalin and Hitler, among others; the creation of the IMF, World Bank and other private "central banks" like the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England; as well as their backing of international organizations like the United Nations, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization has sought to control not only the purse strings of the governments of the world, but also the policies, laws and programs that those governments and agencies implement.
Through their financing of both sides of wars (WWI and II, Cold War, War on Drugs, War on Terror, etc); their manufacture of financial crisis (Great Depression, the coming Greater Depression) and financing of ideological movements (eugenics/population control, feminism, communism, fascism, global warming, etc) the banking cartel has sought to undercut the political, economic and social sovereignty of nations around the world. As a result, their IMF, World Bank and other central bank proxies have managed to put nation after nation in massive debt to them. And as a result, they can further manipulate and control the governments (and citizens) of those nations to further enact their goal of a global government and banking system run - by them and for them - at the expense of all of humanity.
IMO, the New World Order is not a Jewish thing, it’s not a religious thing, it’s not even solely a money thing (although money is its greatest weapon). It instead is a control thing. They banking elite want to be able to control the globe and everyone in it.
However, as many who attempt to debunk the New World Order exists have said, nationalism and traditional political and ethnic hostilities have hampered the cartel’s quest for a one world government. Because of this, Russia, China and renegade states like Iran and Venezuela remain largely on the fringes of the NWO’s inner circle. Russia and China are both too big (unlike Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama) and potentially valuable to the cause to ignore or wipe out. But while political and economic relations exist between the western powers and the two outsiders; the potential for conflict with Russia and China in Eurasia or Africa remain very real.
Throughout the last century, the countries and political leaders that refused to play ball with the banking cartel got their asses kicked. Unfortunately, in the post-WWII world, the United States (both covertly and overtly) has been doing most of the ass kicking for the cartel. And we are in debt up to our eyeballs and our Constitution is hanging by a thread because of it (more on that later). Of course, we see the lesser “outsiders” Iran and Venezuela cozy up to Russia and China and use it to their advantage to thwart the banking cartel’s attempts to have the U.S., or other pro-cartel, military force take them out.
But, just as it was in the World Wars and the Cold War, the banking cartel benefits if any conflict (short of all-out thermonuclear war) takes place between major and even lesser powers. That’s because war - and the debt that follows it – makes them more money. And it also allows the cartel to step in and offer a “solution” for a peaceful future once hostilities are over, as they did with the United Nations and the Bretton Woods economic makeover after World War II.
Of course the United Nations, through the corporate media, has largely been painted ineffective to this point. But that ineffectiveness is only on the surface. When it comes to controlling the third world via their population control, medical and economic programs – which are full of systematic graft and corruption – the success of the UN has been tremendous because they “control” the third world by keeping it in the political and economic shitter while their resources are being stripped right out from under the very people the UN is supposed to be helping.
But, as money is the NWO’s greatest weapon, and nationalism and traditional nation-state and religious strife is painted as a major threat to its goals (it's not of course, because as Smedley Butler said "War Is A Racket"). The biggest threat to the New World Order and their aims is the belief of personal liberty and the political self-determination that comes with it; which has stemmed largely from the United States since we were still colonies under British control.
That doctrine – which the whole of good humanity has aspired to and dreamed of for two centuries – and the future of what it entails is where We the People of the United States come in. What the banking cartel has been doing to other nations – engineered economic collapse via their economic hitmen and Wall Street jackals – is now being done to the United States. Our economy is being systematically destroyed through unprecedented debt via the private Federal Reserve. The goal – as it was in other countries who refuse to yield to global government - is to completely collapse the U.S. economy. Then – through the civil unrest and economic carnage that follows the collapse – install a centrally dominated, dictatorial government where, in the case of the United States, the Constitution and Bill of Rights no longer exist.
You can see now through the corporate media how anyone who questions the government and their policies as being painted as a potential terrorist.....(....)
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Abolishing the Financial Services Authority (FSA)
Posted by NO ONE TO VOTE FOR.(( ))
'There is a fundamental fraud embedded in the new Conservative Party policy of abolishing the FSA and transferring most of its powers to the Bank Of England. We are expected to believe that the Bank of England will protect our (i.e. the public's) interests. In fact the very purpose of this bank is to protect the interests of the banking system, i.e. the interests of the private banks that create 97% of our money
 and charge us interest for the privilege of doing so.
It is easy to realise, indeed obvious, that there is a serious conflict between our interests and those of the banks. The entire banking system is a fraud perpetrated against the public. These private banks are parasites on the back of all real wealth creators. The 'fractional reserve' banking money-creation scam has made them so wealthy .....that they, rather than we the electorate, control our elected representatives.'
In spite of the banks enormous wealth they have created trillions of dollars of worthless toxic derivatives that they hold in their vaults (but are not forced to declare in public). It is estimated that up to 1.5 thousand trillion dollars* of these worthless assets are now concealed within the banking system. If the banks were forced to reveal this information they would all have to be declared BANKRUPT. This is the reality of the situation.
Our governments' solution to this situation is:
What fools we are to allow these thieves to create money ..... when our government could easily do so for itself at NO interest.
Have politicians kicked out the banks before in order for the state to create its own money?
US President Andrew Jackson did this.
US President Abraham Lincoln did this.
US President William McKinley was about to do this when he was assassinated.
US President John F. Kennedy did this.
Kennedy and Lincoln were also assassinated. Jackson survived two attempts on his life.
Do we begin to understand the kind of people that are running this banking system?
The people who control international banking are criminals and rogues on a literally unimaginable scale.
Neither have they finished yet.
It seems that a collapse of the dollar has been engineered** to occur within the next few months. When this collapse occurs the banking oligarchs will have their long-held plan for a single global currency waiting and ready to implement. Most worryingly, they may consider it necessary to have a short but severe war
 to soften us up to swallow this unpleasant pill.
We must educate ourselves....
....oppose the system.....
.....and say our prayers.
“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.”
Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928). Reputed to be the 2nd wealthiest man in England at that time.
Some American politicians are getting angry. Henry Paulson, US Treasury Secretary and author of the initial $700 billion (now into many trillions) 'bail-out', takes a good kicking from Congressman Stearns. About time..
One of the greatest documentaries ever made. The real history of the last few centuries (that you don't get told in school).
The MoneyMasters  The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America - 3:35:19 - Mar 27, 2007  
             Also watch FIREWALL: ( "The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world's money..." THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money.
 The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers.
 Segments: The Problem; The Money Changers; Roman Empire; The Goldsmiths of Medieval England; Tally Sticks; The Bank of England; The Rise of the Rothschilds; The American Revolution; The Bank of North America; The Constitutional Convention; First Bank of the U.S.; Napoleon's Rise to Power; Death of the First Bank of the U.S. / War of 1812; Waterloo; Second Bank of the U.S.; Andrew Jackson; Fort Knox; World Central Bank; Loose Change 911 truth police state globalists NWO New World Order Federal Reserve Alex Jones Aaron Russo America From Freedom To Fascism zionist IMF BIS John Perkins 911 911 Globalism bilderberg Rothschild Rockefeller Schiff Warburg illuminati bohemian grove idi amin freemason
Also recommended: "Firewall: In Defense of Nation State" Video news on "Federal Reserve":«
                                 Posted by NO ONE TO VOTE FOR
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
How Stanley Kubrick Faked the Apollo Moon Landings
'It has now been forty years since the fabled moon landings by NASA and the Apollo gang. When it comes to the subject of the moon landings, people tend to fall into two belief groups. The first group, by far the bigger of the two groups, accepts the fact that NASA successfully landed on the moon six times and that 12 human beings have actually walked on the surface of the moon.
The second group, though far smaller, is more vocal about their beliefs. This group says that we never went to the moon and that the entire thing was faked. This essay presents a third position on this issue.
This third point of view falls somewhere between these two assertions. This third position postulates that humans did go to the moon but what we saw on TV and in photographs was completely faked. Furthermore this third position reveals that the great filmmaker Stanley Kubrick is the genius who directed the hoaxed landings.'
...(...) Authors Joseph Farrell and Henry Stevens both have shown us undeniable proof that Nazi scientists had developed advanced flying saucer technology as early as 1943. These authors also show that the US Government brought these same Nazi scientists into this country in order to build these highly advanced flying machines. ......
Many sources inside the military industrial complex have related to me that after John Kennedy was shown the flying saucer technology early in his Presidency, he realized that the advances in technology promised by the flying saucers could solve many of the pressing problems of the world. He saw that releasing this exotic technology would point the way towards cheap and environmentally friendly energy among other things.
Soon after seeing the flying saucer technology, JFK made his famous speech asking NASA to land a man on the moon before the decade was out. Many insiders believed that this was a ploy by JFK to get NASA, and the secret government, to release their saucer technologies. Since it was obvious to everyone that standard rocket technology could not get man to the moon and back, JFK may have thought that NASA would be forced to release the knowledge of the technology behind the flying saucers in order to fulfill his vision and get to the moon by the end of the 1960's. JFK's ploy was therefore intended to free this advanced technology from the insidious hands of the shadow government.
After the assassination of Kennedy in 1963, NASA began a new plan that would solve the problem that JFK initiated. This new plan would allow NASA, and the shadow government, to keep the saucer technology secret and to still make it look like standard rocketry had taken man to the moon and back.
Someone high up in the shadow government decided to fake the entire moon landings in order to conceal the United States' extremely new and advanced Nazi technology both from us, the citizens and our enemies.
In some ways NASA's position on this was understandable. We were in the middle of the cold war with the Soviet Union. Did we really want to show the Russians what we had?
...(...) While directing Dr. Strangelove Kubrick had asked the US Air Force for permission to film one of their B-52 bombers for the movie. The Pentagon turned him down.
The movie, Dr. Strangelove, was about a flight squadron that had been ordered to fly to Russia and drop nuclear bombs on that country. The Pentagon read Kubrick's script and rejected his request to actually film the inside, and outside, of a B-52.
The reason for this rejection was that Kubrick's film was clearly a satire on the military and US nuclear policy. The Pentagon did not want to assist Kubrick in this satirical undertaking.
Undaunted by the rejection, Kubrick used various special effects to create the B-52 in flight. When viewing Dr. Strangelove today, these special effects look quaint and old fashioned, but in 1963 they looked very good. It is possible that someone in NASA saw what Kubrick had done in Dr. Strangelove and, admiring his artfulness, designated Kubrick as the person best qualified to direct the Apollo Moon landing. If he could do that well on a limited budget - what could he do on an unlimited budget?
No one knows how the powers-that-be convinced Kubrick to direct the Apollo landings. Maybe they had compromised Kubrick in some way. The fact that his brother, Raul Kubrick, was the head of the American Communist Party may have been one of the avenues pursued by the government to get Stanley to cooperate.
Kubrick also had a reputation for being a notoriously nasty negotiator. It would have been very interesting to have been a fly on the wall during the negotiations between Kubrick and NASA.
In the end, it looks like Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landings in return for two things. The first was a virtually unlimited budget to make his ultimate science fiction film: 2001: A Space Odyssey, and the second was that he would be able to make any film he wanted, with no oversight from anyone, for the rest of his life.
Except for his last film, Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick got what he wanted.
It is uncanny the way that the production of 2001: A Space Odyssey parallels the Apollo program. The film production started in 1964 and went on to the release of 2001: A Space Odyssey in1968. Meanwhile the Apollo program also began in 1964 and culminated with the first moon landings on July 20th 1969.
...  No one knows how many things he tried but eventually Kubrick settled on doing the entire thing with a cinematic technique called Front Screen Projection.
It is in the use of this cinematic technique that the fingerprints of Kubrick can be seen all over the NASA Apollo photographic and video material.
What is Front Screen Projection?
Kubrick did not invent the process but there is no doubt that he perfected it. Front Screen Projection is a cinematic device that allows scenes to be projected behind the actors so that it appears, in the camera, as if the actors are moving around on the set provided by the Front Screen Projection.
The process came into fruition when the 3M company invented a material called Scotchlite. This was a screen material that was made up of hundreds of thousands of tiny glass beads each about .4mm wide. These beads were highly reflective. In the Front Screen Projection process the Scotchlite screen would be placed at the back of the soundstage. The plane of the camera lens and the Scotchlite screen had to be exactly 90 degrees apart. A projector would project the scene onto the Scotchlite screen through a mirror and the light would go through a beam splitter, which would pass the light into the camera. An actor would stand in front of the Scotchlite screen and he would appear to be 'inside' the projection. ....  Today Hollywood magicians use green screens and computers for special effects and so Front Screen Projection has gone the way of the Adding Machine and the Model T, but for its time, especially in the 1960's, nothing worked better than Front Screen Projection for the realistic look that would be needed both for the ape-men scenes in 2001: A Space Odyssey and the faked Apollo landings.
To see how Front Screen Projection looks on the screen let's examine the ape-men scenes at the beginning of Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey. While viewing the stills from these scenes, or watching them in the film, one has to remember that the early scenes in 2001 with the actors in Ape costumes were all done on a soundstage. None of what you are seeing in the ape-men scenes at the beginning of 2001 was actually shot outside. The scenes that surround the ape-men in 2001 are actually slides of a desert being projected onto Scotchlite screens standing at the rear of the set.
In order to create these desert backgrounds Kubrick sent a photographic team to Spain to shoot 8'' X 10'' Ektachrome slides. These slides were then projected via the Front Screen Projection system onto the Scotchlite screen. The actors in ape costumes stood in front of the screen acting out the script.
If you watch 2001 on DVD you can actually see the 'seams' of the screen occasionally behind the gyrating apes. Kubrick was doing Front Screen Projection on such a huge and grand fashion that the technicians were forced to sew together many screens of Scotchlite so that Kubrick could create the vastness needed for the ape scenes to be believable.
In this still taken from an early scene in 2001 you can see the seams in the blue sky if you look closely. ....  Now we can clearly see the 'seams' and the 'stitching' of the Scotchlite Front Projection screen in the sky.
To get the perspective correct one has to realize that the Scotchlite screen is right behind the rocky outcropping set, which was built on the soundstage.
The lines on the screen are the flaws in the Scotchlite screen. These flaws in the screen give the sky give a peculiar 'geometry' when the image is properly processed to reveal the Front Projection Scotchlite Screen....(...) While watching 2001,with the scenes of the ape-men, one can begin to see the tell tale fingerprints that always reveal when the Front Screen Projection system is being used.
It should be emphasized that the sets that surround the ape-men in the movie are real. Those are 'real' rocks (whether paper mache or real) that surround the ape-men. But behind the fabricated rocks on the set, the desert scene is being projected via the Front Screen Projector.
One of the ways that you can tell the Front Screen system is being used is that the bottom horizon line between the actual set and the background Scotchlite screen has to be blocked. Kubrick strategically located rocks and other things near the bottom of the scene in order to hide the projection screen. In other words, the camera and the viewers would see the bottom of the background projection screen if it weren't blocked in some fashion. As part of the 'trick' it became necessary to place things in between the screen and the set to hide the bottom of the screen. ....  I have photo-shopped a line differentiating the set and the background Scotchlite Front Projection Screen. Please note how everything is in focus, from the pebbles on the ground in the set to the desert mountains beyond.
You will see that hiding the bottom of the Scotchlite screen is always being done when the Front Screen Projection system is used in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hiding the screen is one of the fingerprints; it is evidence of its use. Just like the stage magician who needs the long sleeves of his costume to hide the mechanism of his tricks, so too Kubrick needed to hide the mechanism of his trick behind the carefully placed horizon line between set and screen. ....
And you will see, before this article is finished, that this same fingerprint, this same evidence, is clearly seen in all of the NASA Apollo stills and video footage.
It is this fingerprint that reveals, not only that NASA faked the Apollo missions but also HOW they faked them.
Let's examine a few NASA Apollo images now.
Again I have photo-shopped a line indicating the back of the set. One can see that there is a slight uprising behind the rover, which is hiding the bottom of the screen. Also notice that even though everything is in focus from the lunar rover to the mountains in the background, there is a strange change in the landscape of the ground right behind my lines. This is because the photo of the mountains being used on the Front Projection system has a slightly different ground texture than the set. As we go on we will see that this fingerprint is also consistent throughout the Apollo images. .... 
Here is another Apollo image.
Now here is my version where I show the line between set and screen.
Again notice that the texture of the ground changes right behind my lines.
Now let's go to some more Apollo images. We can see that the same thing occurs here as in the ape-men scenes in 2001. There is always a line separating the set from the screen.
Even if you do not see it at first it will become apparent, as one grows more familiar with the Front Screen Projection process and how it is being used to fake the astronauts standing on the lunar surface.
Go to any NASA site like ( and start looking for yourself.
Not all lunar surface shots are using the process. Sometimes the astronauts are just standing on the set with a completely (and suspicious) black background. The early missions used the Front Screen Projection system only when they had to. But as the missions went on and they had to look better, Kubrick began to perfect the process.
Although you can see the Front Screen Projection process on every mission, the seriously revealing images are in the later missions, particularly Apollo 14, 15, 16 and (my favorite) 17.   Here are a few from Apollo 17....(...)
The astronaut is about six feet in front of the Scotchlite screen. Please note how everything is in focus from the rocks and pebbles close to the camera all the way to the crystal clear mountain behind the astronaut. As we shall see very soon, even that is impossible.
Also please note the other tell tale evidence that permeates the Apollo images: There is a stark difference in the ground texture between the set and what is being projected onto the screen. You can almost count the number of small rocks and the granularity of the ground is clearly seen on the set. But once we get to the screen on the other side of my line this granularity disappears.
This next image is slick little piece of work. When first viewed one is sure that they are looking across the vast unbroken lunar surface from beginning to end. With the Earth rising, it is truly a stunning shot....(...)
Doesn't the fakery just make you all patriotic inside?
Besides the telltale evidence of the horizon line between set and screen and the changing granularity of the texture of the ground, there is another telltale fingerprint that comes with Front Screen Projection. This has to do with a photographic situation called depth of field. Depth of field has to do with the plane of focus that the lens of the camera is tuned to.
The main rule of thumb in photography is that the larger the format of the film the less depth of field. For instance, 16mm film has a large depth of field. 35mm has a smaller depth of field and 70 mm (which Stanley was using in 2001 as were all of the astronaut-photographers in the Apollo missions) has an incredibly small depth of field.
What this means is that it is virtually impossible for two objects that are far apart in the lens of a 70mm camera to be in the same plane of focus. One of the two objects will always be out-of-focus. Filmmakers like to use depth of field because it creates soft out-of-focus backgrounds that are visually very pleasant to the human eye.
While watching the ape-men scenes at the beginning of 2001, one can see that everything is in focus. Whether it is the apes - or the far away desert background - they are all in focus. This is because the Front Projection Screen on which the background desert scenes is projected is actually not far away from the ape actor. In reality the Scotchlite screen containing the desert scene is right behind the actors just as the Scotchlite screen is right behind the astronauts in the Apollo images. So whatever is projected onto that screen will usually be in the same plane of focus as the actor-ape or the actor-astronaut.
This depth of field is impossible in real life using a large format film like 70 mm. Keeping everything in focus is only possible if everything is actually confined to a small place.
It may look like the ape-men are somewhere in a huge desert landscape but in reality they are all on a small set in a studio.
It may look like the astronauts are on a vast lunar landscape but actually they are on a small confined set.
According to the NASA literature, the Apollo astronauts were using large format Hassleblad cameras. These cameras were provided with large rolls of 70 mm film on which they took the images. This large format film is exactly the same size film that Kubrick was using when shooting 2001.
The plane of focus, the depth of field, on these cameras is incredibly small. This should have been a huge problem for the astronaut-photographers, who would have to be constantly adjusting the focus. We therefore should expect to see a lot of out of focus shots taken by the astronauts. When you consider the fact that, because of their helmets, they did not even have the ability to see through the viewfinder of their cameras, this would have only increased the chances that most of what they would be shooting would be out of focus.
I have gone through the entire photographic record of Apollo program, both at Goddard in Greenbelt, Maryland in the main photographic repository at NASA's Houston headquarters.
When the Apollo photographic record is examined, the exact opposite of what one would expect to find is discovered. Instead of many out of focus shots, we find that nearly every shot is in pristine focus. And these amateur photographer-astronauts have an uncanny sense of composition, especially when one remembers that they are not even able to look through their camera's viewfinders. Their images have the unmistakable quality of a highly polished professional photographer.
Before embarking on his film career Stanley Kubrick was a professional photographer working for Look Magazine.
Honestly, even a professional photographer looking through the viewer of the camera would be hard pressed to come up with the pristine imagery and crystal clear focus of the Apollo astronaut amateur photographers.
Unfortunately though, for everyone involved, the fact that everything is in focus in the Apollo record is the old telltale fingerprint of Front Screen Projection.
Examine the above photographs from Apollo. Please note how everything is in focus. As one goes through the entire Apollo record they will discover that the astronaut photographers never seem to have a problem with depth of field. Even though you could never get everything to remain in focus over such vast distances here on Earth, somehow the rules of physics are bypassed when men shoot photographs on the lunar surface.
Indeed the very physics of lens dynamics and depth of field apparently disappears when the astronauts shoot photographs. (Just for the record the cameras were not altered at all by Hasselblad or anyone else).
As a professional photographer and a filmmaker I have wrestled with depth of field problems for over 40 years. I am surprised that no other photographer has noticed the lack of depth of field problems encountered by the astronaut-photographers. In reality the lack of depth of field problems is a nail in the coffin of the Apollo program.
Former NASA consultant Richard Hoagland has examined many of the photos of the Apollo landings and, although he has never noticed the impossible depth of field, he has found other strange anomalies in the NASA material.
Examining the photographic record of the Apollo missions, and processing Apollo images through various graphics programs, Hoagland has discovered 'geometries' in the skies surrounding the astronauts on the moon. He postulates that these geometries are evidence of some kind of gigantic glass-like structures behind, above and surrounding the astronauts as they stand on the lunar surface. Hoagland even shows us that there are rainbow lights reflecting in the sky high above the astronauts.
Many people, especially in NASA, have attacked Hoagland for these interpretations. Yet, no matter how much they attack Hoagland, they can never explain what it is that he is finding on these Apollo images. In the same way that evidence in the JFK assassination and the high weirdness around 911 is never examined and explained by the anti-conspiracy theorists, so too, is Hoagland's evidence just simply ignored by the critics.
Instead they have created an ad hominum attack machine that criticizes Hoagland - the man - while deftly ignoring his intriguing evidence.
His critics are either wrong or they know what is really happening.
I have known Richard Hoagland for a long time. I was with him during his initial discoveries of artifacts on the lunar surface. I have seen photographic evidence that there are very strange things on the surface of the moon. I am not here to start an argument with Mr. Hoagland or anyone else.
I, like Hoagland, believe that NASA has actually gone to the moon. I believe that moon rocks were taken from the surface of the moon. I believe that there is strong evidence of some kind of past intelligent activity on surface of the moon. But I do not believe that standard rocket technology is what got mankind from the Earth to the surface of the Moon.
I am not trying to debunk Hoagland's discoveries. All I am trying to do, with the following evidence, is show that the Apollo landings were a hoax. And that Stanley Kubrick, using the Front Screen Projection system, directed them.
Again I want to make sure that I am understood here. I am not saying that there are not strange structures on the moon. What I am saying is that the structures and geometries that Richard Hoagland is seeing in the photographs taken on the lunar surface are not what he thinks they are.
Here are a few of Hoagland's images. He believes that these images are proof that NASA is hiding evidence of alien cities....(...) Hoagland has taken the image on the left and processed it in a manner very similar to how I processed the above images from 2001: A Space Odyssey. By increasing the gamma and the contrast of the image he arrived at the picture on the right.  Hoagland interprets the image on the right as proof of giant glass structures behind the astronaut and, for that matter, all over the surface of the moon.
            What Hoagland is really seeing, though, is the imperfections in the background Scotchlite screen that Kubrick used to create the lunar backgrounds. These imperfections can also be found in the desert backgrounds in the ape scenes in 2001: A Space Odyssey (see above).    What Hoagland, and the above image reveals, is the texture and geometry of the Scotchlite screen.
Because of the vastness of the set, because he needed it to look like it was NOT DONE ON A SOUNDSTAGE, Kubrick had to sew several Scotchlite screens together. It was only when he had created a large enough Scotchlite screen was he then was able to get a large enough background image that would look expansive enough to appear to be the surface of the moon or a desert four million years ago.
The same process that created the desert backgrounds in 2001 is the same process that created the lunar mountains backgrounds for the Apollo missions. .......
This is picture from Hoagland's research.
The processed image reveals a rainbow-like reflecting light high above the astronauts in the sky on the moon. Hoagland theorizes that this is a light reflecting off of one of the giant glass towers standing right behind the astronaut.
What this is really is a light reflecting off of one of the tiny glass beads of the Scotchlite screen. For some reason that particular glass bead was slightly off from its 90-degree angle and so it caught the projector light and reflected it back to the camera. ..... 
 It is pretty clear from the two images above that Hoagland's 'geometries' are really the patterns and flaws and stitches in the Scotchlite screen.
Maybe this is why NASA suddenly lost all of its lunar images. Maybe this is why NASA just admitted that they 'accidentally' taped over the original high-resolution tape of Apollo 11. Maybe this is why Neil Armstrong, 'the first man to walk on the moon', doesn't want to participate in the 40 th anniversary parties.
Maybe this is why we have never gone back to the moon.
Many researchers have pointed out the different angles of light on the surface of the moon. Because there is only one light source (the sun) how can there be multiple light angles on the moon such as this?:
How can the astronaut's two shadows not be consistent with each other? If they were actually standing in the bright light of the sun, their two shadows should be at the same exact angle. Yet they are not. Why? Because Kubrick used studio lighting!
But why would Kubrick make a mistake like the inconsistent shadows in the above image? A great filmmaker like Kubrick must have realized that this was a huge mistake.
My answer is that Kubrick did this on purpose.
He left behind telltale evidence for his work. And he did this on purpose. Not just in the above shot but actually all over the Apollo photographic record.
In my forthcoming documentary on the NASA Apollo fakery titled "Kubrick's Odyssey", I will reveal much more photographic evidence than I possibly can in this short essay.
One thing that I am sure is that some part of Stanley Kubrick wanted everyone to know what he had done. And that is why he left behind clues that would explain who did it and how. ...(...)
Those of you who are familiar with my essay, written in 1999, on 2001: A Space Odyssey called Alchemical Kubrick (see already know that I believe that 2001 A Space Odyssey is the greatest esoteric film of all time.
For the first time anywhere, in that essay, I show how Kubrick designed the black monolith to be exactly the same size as the screen on which 2001 was projected. The monolith and the screen are the same thing. The monolith is the screen and the screen is the monolith. It is truly one of the greatest discoveries in cinema history.
When one realizes that Kubrick also used the Front Screen Projection system - not only for the ape scenes in 2001 - but also the fake the moon landings - we can see a double, or even possibly a triple meaning, inside the idea that the screen is the monolith and the monolith is the screen.
If the monolith is that device that enlightens humanity then the Front Screen Projection system, and it's unmistakable fingerprints, is the device that enlightens humanity as to how the Apollo landings were faked....(...)
The President of MGM, at the time in 1968, publicly stated, that he never even saw a rough cut of 2001: A Space Odyssey during the entire four years of production. Does that sound like the manner in which a head of a major studio would act? 2001: A Space Odyssey was one of the most expensive films ever made at that time. Does it even seem remotely possible that no one at MGM even cared to see the continuous progress of the film?
No way.
I am sure that 2001: A Space Odyssey is the only film in MGM history where the executives who funded the movie never scrutinized the film.
Why weren't they more interested in this very expensive endeavor?
Because MGM did not fund 2001, the US Government did.
Outside of the Front Screen Projection evidence, which I believe nails the fraud of the Apollo landings; there is other circumstantial evidence that forces the conclusion even more in the direction of Kubrick directing the entire Apollo missions.
For instance:
In the original release of 2001 there were many credits thanking NASA and many of the aerospace companies that worked with NASA on the moon landings. These credits have since been removed from all subsequent releases of 2001. But for those of us old enough to remember, in the original credits, Kubrick thanks a vast array of military and space corporations for their help in the production. ...(...)
Stanley Kubrick died soon after showing Eyes Wide Shut to the executives at Warner Brothers. It is rumored that they were very upset concerning that film. They wanted Kubrick to re-edit the film but he refused. I personally was in France when Stanley died and I saw, on French television, outtakes from the forthcoming Eyes Wide Shut. I saw outtakes from several scenes that were never in the finished film.
Warner Brothers has even come out and admitted that they re-edited the film. To this day they refuse to release a DVD of Stanley Kubrick's cut. Not only is this a direct violation of the agreement that Kubrick had with Warner Brothers but also it means that we will probably never see the un-edited version of this film.
One has to wonder what was cut out?
And finally:
Eyes Wide Shut was released on July 16 th 1999.
Stanley Kubrick insisted in his contract that this be the date of the release.
July 16 th 1999 is exactly 30 years to the day that Apollo 11 was launched.
Happy Fortieth Anniversary Stanley. Now you can rest in peace.  to  ( a-b-c-d )
.................local news................Kingston drama.............
Parents, son suspected of honour killing in canal deaths
A floral memorial left to four women who died in a submerged car is shown at the Kingston Mills Lock in Kingston, Ont., Thursday, July 23, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Peter RedmanThe Canadian Press - KINGSTON, Ont. - The suspicious deaths of three Montreal sisters and a caregiver found inexplicably in a car submerged in the Rideau Canal took a dramatic turn Thursday as police alleged the four had been murdered by the girls' parents and brother in a possible "honour killing."
By Sunny Freeman, The Canadian Press
KINGSTON, Ont. - The suspicious deaths of three Montreal sisters and a caregiver ((the first wife )) found inexplicably in a car submerged in the Rideau Canal took a dramatic turn Thursday as police alleged the four had been murdered by the girls' parents and brother in a possible "honour killing."
Kingston police Chief Stephen Tanner said investigators were looking into whether the parents and their 18-year-old son were motivated to kill the girls aged 19, 17 and 13, in a deadly clash of cultures.
The fourth victim was 52-year-old Rona Amir Mohammad. Police for the first time said she was the first wife of the older accused in the case, Mohammad Shafia.
The parents - Shafia and his wife Tooba Mohammad Yahya - and their 18-year-old son Hamed Mohammad-Shafia are charged with first-degree murder.
The three accused arrived for a bail hearing in Kingston court Thursday afternoon, with the girls' parents arriving in separate police cruisers. The son was the last to arrive in an unmarked car, dressed in a black T-shirt and jeans. He was taken past media through the back of the courthouse.
The family, originally from Kabul, Afghanistan, spent 15 years in Dubai before moving to Montreal two years ago.
Tanner said the girls were living as "Canadian teenagers."

--- En date de : Mar, 23.6.09, béate <> a écrit :

À:,,,,, "benjamin fulford" <>, "christopher story" <>,, Ken6@Ken-Welch.Com,, "richard glenn" <>
Date: mardi 23 Juin 2009, 12 h 56
du jour!