sorcha-nebraska - alcuin - icke-malthusianism-euthanasia - fw10-larouche-genocide - nenki-CliffHigh - c-story(3) -
December 17, 2009
Nuclear Attack On Nebraska US Air Force Base Foiled
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Russian Space Forces are reporting to Prime Minster Putin today that the United States Air Forces’ Offutt Strategic Command Base located in Nebraska has survived a nuclear cruise missile attack directed against it after it was successfully shot down by one of the Americans particle beam weapons used to protect this most critical of US military bases.
So powerful was the explosion when this attacking AGM-129A cruise missile, armed with a W80-1 variable yield nuclear warhead, was destroyed that reports from one of the witnesses, Nebraska State Police Trooper Jerry Chab, was quoted by the Spaceweather.Com News Service as saying about what he believed to be a fireball that “It flashed for approximately 2 seconds and was followed by ground shaking, which prompted many calls by the public to law enforcement in a three county wide area.”
The AGM-129A is carried exclusively by the US Air Force's B-52H Stratofortress bombers:
Other reports from Nebraska further confirm Officer Chab’s description of the downing of this nuclear armed cruise missile with the United States Geological Service (USGS) reporting that upon its being destroyed, just before 9:00 PM local time,
they registered a 3.5 Magnitude earthquake.(( http://www.ketv.com/mostpopular/21988171/detail.html ))
Russian Military Analysts further state in these reports that this attack was not ‘unexpected’ by the Americans, who had hours prior to the destruction of this cruise missile, activated their missile defense system protecting North America under the guise of testing this system against an Iranian nuclear missile attack, and upon one of their particle beam weapons being fired to destroy it, released an ‘unmistakable electronic signature’ recorded by Russian Space Forces satellites
monitoring this region of the World.
Note: A particle beam weapon uses an ultra high energy beam of atoms or electrons (eg., a particle beam) to damage a material target by hitting it, and thus disrupting its atomic and molecular structure. A particle beam weapon is a type of directed-energy weapon which directs energy in a particular direction by a means of particle projectiles with mass.
Important to note of this latest attack is that it is the second one of its kind in the past month after the secretive Central Intelligence Agency base located at the Denver International Airport, was similarly targeted in last month, and as we had reported on in our November 20th report titled “Nuclear Attack On Denver Fails, US Air Force Explodes Missile In Sky”.(( http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1301.htm ))
Fueling the increasingly rising tensions between the various power factions in the United States seeking control of their Nation, and leading to this latest attack, these reports say, is President Obama’s ordering the ‘extermination’ of the CIA-Pakistani Intelligence Service (ISI) backed al Qaeda and Taliban terror organizations these spy agencies have used to plunge our World into war these past 8 years.
Indian officials are further reporting that one of the main ‘rogue’ CIA operatives involved in this plot, named David Coleman Headley, has been captured in the United States by Federal Police Forces (FBI) loyal to Obama, but/who? are refusing to allow India intelligence officers to have access to him.
These US FBI Forces interrogating Headley are, also, now confirming that he has confessed to them that Pakistani Military Officers are working with these terror groups, and which led Pakistan to retaliate by arresting 3 American Embassy officers, and issue a warning that the CIA now poses a ‘serious threat’ to their government.
As is always the case in these types of events, the American people are being kept from knowing the truth of these most important of events that are determining their lives by their government and propaganda media organs who seek not to enjoin their own citizens in protecting their Nation, but continue upon a course that will see these peoples become enslaved to their banking and corporate masters.
And not just to these attacks in their own country are the American people being denied information, but also to the expanding of their war into the Middle East, where after the CIA Director Leon E. Panetta’s meeting with Saudi Arabia's King Abdallah, on November 15th, US Fighter Jets have continued their attacks in Yemen, where reports from rebel forces state over 120 people have been killed.
To all of these events it is not in our knowing as to their final outcome, other than an observation that when people, such as these Americans, continue to allow themselves to be lied to by their government and propaganda in order for them to maintain an illusion of peace and security, their total destruction nears ever closer to them.
© December 17, 2009 EU and US all rights reserved
Why Are You Here?
More Sorcha Faal Reports
Return To Main Page
Return To Alternative News
CURIOUS EVENTS IN NEBRASKA: "Last night, Dec. 16th at 9 p.m. CST, a very bright meteor lit up the completely overcast sky like lightning in southeast Nebraska," reports Trooper Jerry Chab of the Nebraska State Patrol. "It flashed for approximately 2 seconds and was followed by sonic booms and ground shaking,...(...) "If the earthquake is confirmed, as it appears to be, I think we have the most cosmic of coincidences: A large fireball around the same time of an earthquake," says Chab. "I am simply amazed!"
One possible interpretation of these events is that a small asteroid hit Earth's atmosphere and caused the ground to shake when it exploded in mid-air. However, the timing might not be right. The quake seems to have preceded the fireball. Several readers have pointed out studies that associate lightning-like phenomena with earthquakes: #1, #2, #3. So, the earthquake might be responsible for both the shaking and the light show. Or it might be a big coincidence just as Chab suggests.
More reports could help sort out the possibilities. Readers in Nebraska with photos or eyewitness accounts are encouraged to submit their observations. http://www.spaceweather.com/
December 17, 2009 1:53 PM
Joe Kovacs Written,Dec. 16, 2009
[NOTE: Did Obama attempt to blow up Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, as reported by Sorcha Faal, because Ben Nelson would not vote for Obama's health-care bil? ---PHB]
Twenty senators are demanding an investigation into reports the Obama administration threatened to close Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska if that state's Democratic senator, Ben Nelson, didn't join other Democrats in voting for health-care reform.
The group of 20, all Republicans, today called for a hearing in a letter to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., and the committee's top Republican Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
The text of the letter states:
It has been reported that the Obama Administration threatened the closure of a U.S. military installation for political purposes, thereby bringing into question the integrity of the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process. The BRAC process was established to remove political influence so that the decision to close or not to close a military installation could be based upon military utility.
Specifically, various media reports have stated that the Obama Administration would put Offutt AFB in southeastern Nebraska on a future BRAC list because of a vote on healthcare reform. While we recognize the importance of Offutt AFB as the headquarters of U.S. Strategic Command and the approximately 10,000 individuals that work there, we feel that this installation should remain open or be closed on its own merits.
Therefore, we respectfully ask that a hearing be held as to whether the BRAC process has been compromised. We do not want to see the name of a base from our state on a BRAC list and think it has been put there to settle partisan scores. We also do not want our bases to be more vulnerable to closure because political arm-twisting has taken another installation off the table. National security not partisanship should determine how BRAC decisions are made.
Weekly Standard columnist Michael Goldfarb was among those raising the issue in a post in which he said: "According to a Senate aide, the White House is now threatening to put Nebraska's Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list if Nelson doesn't fall into line" on health-care reform.
For just $29.95, you can send every member of Congress a "pink slip" with the warning: Don't mess with my health care, our you're outta there!
Both the White House and Nelson are denying any such threat ever existed.
"This rumor is absolutely false, as the people spreading it well know," said Dan Pfeiffer, the White House communications director. "This is nothing but a cynical, crass political game that is designed to maintain the status quo. Let's be clear: the people spreading these falsehoods think nothing is wrong with a system under which families and businesses continue to bear the brunt of skyrocketing costs, insurance companies are allowed to discriminate and drop at will, and thousands of Americans lose their coverage every single day."
Despite the denials, some WND readers have expressed outrage if a threat were indeed made. "It is time for some spines on the Hill to impeach Obama and charge him with treason," said reader Tom Bender.
"This is simply amazing that we the people are permitting this type of politics in our country," noted another, Mike Kovach. "Not that this hasn't been done before, but this administration is on a course to destroy our nation. I am beginning to wonder why there has not been calls of subversion, treason and sedition against this administration. I'm am a Democrat and I would like to see all of those in cohorts with this administration put in jail and charged accordingly."
The Republicans signing the letter were Sens. John Ensign of Nevada, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, John Thune of South Dakota, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker of Tennessee, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Kit Bond of Missouri, Michael Enzi of Wyoming, George LeMieux of Florida, Pat Roberts of Kansas, David Vitter of Louisiana, Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker of Mississipi, John Cornyn of Texas, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, Mike Johanns of Nebraska, Bob Bennett of Utah, Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Chuck Grassley of Iowa.
US Health Care Reform: Kill the Bill
by Micheal Carmichael
America’s most assiduous and articulate advocate for health care reform is Dr. Howard Dean. In the aftermath of the Lieberman crisis that has deleted the medicare buy-in at 55, Dr. Dean has a new political prescription: Kill the Bill.
Dr. Dean’s reasoning is simple : “This is not reform.”
Lieberman’s sabotage appears to be driven by his fealty to the insurance lobby based in his home state, but that is really only the tip of a much larger and more adamantine political iceberg.
The ever vigilant Robert Parry points to Lieberman’s role as a leading public advocate of Israel and that nation’s escalating antipathy to the Obama presidency.
During their secret meeting at the White House on the 9th of November, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to use his influence to undermine Obama’s presidency because he resented the president’s meddling in Israeli relations with the Palestinians and the Arabic nations of the Middle East – in spite of the fact that America is Israel’s sponsor, arms manufacturer, diplomatic shield and sole advocate at the tables of the UN, EU, World Bank, IMF and other plenipotentiary bodies.
One victim of Netanyahu’s overarching hubris is now apparent: Obama’s vaunted health care reform legislation of 2009.
Netanyahu’s agent, Senator Joseph Lieberman, provides the poison to the chalice of health care reform and – at the same time – accomplishes the mission of his ultimate master: the Prime Minister of a government of a foreign nation whose relations have proven to be more than burdensome for the American people.
It is time to sever the umbilicals of nation, state, government and military ties between the USA and Israel that protract the crises in: the Middle East, the global economy; the US Congress; the clinics, surgeries and hospitals of America and the promised lands of Judea, Samaria and Gaza.
Dr. Howard Dean is dead right: Kill the Bill.
********Michael Carmichael is the founder of Planetary:(( http://www.planetarymovement.org/go/newsflash/kill-the-bill-by-michael-carmichael/ ))
December 17, 2009 12:36 PM
Joe Lieberman and the Health Care Train Wreck
Senate leaders want to replace one cancer with another
December 15, 2009 9:16 AM
----- Original Message ----- From: Downsizer Dispatch To: firstname.lastname@example.org Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:06 PM Subject: Senate leaders want to replace one cancer with another Senate leaders are starting to panic over the prospects for their cancerous healthcare bill. They can't seem to find the votes they need. The main problem seems to be the so-called "public option" -- a complex scheme that would create a tax-funded government health insurance company. Senate leaders are proposing to remove this objection by . » read more http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/peace_freedom/patriots_and_protesters/news.php?q=1260893782
Historic Petition Delivery Opposing ObamaCare Underway
December 13, 2009 6:40 AM
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/peace_freedom/patriots_and_protesters/news.php?q=1260711608 and http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/peace_freedom/patriots_and_protesters/news.php?q=1260552002
Mammograms as political weapon
December 15, 2009 9:44 AM
Dec. 13, 2009 The heated Capitol Hill debate over health care coverage for mammograms has exploded onto the political scene, shaping the 2010 electoral landscape and recalibrating the battle for a crucial constituency: the women’s vote. With women’s health issues increasingly at the forefront of the health care debate, pols have turned breast cancer into a potent campaign weapon. The volume in the war has ramped up in recent weeks after a government task force released findings – widely criticized by women’s groups – recommending that it was unnecessary for women under 50 to screen for breast cancer. “It resonates with 52 percent of the electorate,” said Jennifer Duffy, a senior editor for the Cook Political Report. » read more http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/elections/campaigning/vote_fraud/news.php?q=1260895466 and http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/HealthCareReform
Mad Over Mammogram Guidelines, Slowing the Runaway Train. 27 Nov 2009 ...
Jeffrey Dach //Original Article Here.///
In a dramatic break from enshrined medical dogma, the US Preventive Task Force revised their guidelines for breast cancer screening with mammography, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. While previous guidelines started at age 40, the panel now advises against screening the 40-50 age group, because current science based medicine indicates more harm than benefit. The guidelines are now up to date with the European Guidelines which screen women age 50-69 every two years.
Setting Back Evidence-Based-Medicine with Fear Mongering
The mainstream media, government and corporate medicine have strongly opposed the revised guidelines with slick marketing techniques, and fear mongering with appeals to emotion rather than evidence based medicine. Kathleen Sebelius, for example, appeared on national television advising women to ignore her own Department's task force panel, and start mammogram screening at 40. The opposing criticism has at times been bizarre and comical, with one author claiming the new guidelines will cause 47,000 deaths. This would be a impossible, since this exceeds the 30,000 deaths annually before the screening era. These opposing views avoid the real problems with screening mammography.
The Basic Problem With Screening Mammography
The basic problem with screening for breast cancer with mammography is the "reservoir of silent disease". A series of autopsy studies show that indolent breast cancers are common in the population. These early cancers, called DCIS, are silent and rarely cause clinical disease. The most impressive study was from Denmark in 1987. The Danish group used specimen radiography on autopsy samples, which most closely approximates what screening mammography does, searching for and finding small clusters of calcifications.The Danish team found breast cancer in one out of five women, most of which was DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ).
One out of 5 women show breast cancer at autopsy, yet only 2 to 3 women per 10,000 die from breast cancer annually. (20% vs .03%) This indicates a disconnect between the huge reservoir of silent and clinically insignificant disease, and the much smaller number of invasive breast cancer presenting clinically.
DCIS in 18% of the Population
Current screening mammography technology detects 60,000 cases of DCIS annually, and yet, this is only a small fraction of total DCIS present in one out of five women in the population. DCIS is ductal carcinoma in situ, an early form of cancer with a good prognosis, a 98% five year survival with no treatment. I expect future refinements in xray technology to allow detection of even greater numbers of DCIS cases which have small calcifications. Ultimately the technology will catch up and replicate the Danish autopsy findings.
Do we really want to be detecting DCIS in one out of five women, and submit all these women to biopsy and lumpectomy? This is exactly what is advocated by the corporate-government-media sponsored mammography screening programs.
Just Stop Calling It Cancer
Recently, an NIH panel asked pathologists to stop calling DCIS cancer. Here is the NIH Consensus statement: "Because of the noninvasive nature of DCIS, coupled with its favorable prognosis, strong consideration should be given to elimination of the use of the anxiety-producing term “carcinoma” from the description of DCIS. "
Less is Better
I beg to offer a differing opinion more in line with the US Preventive Task Force revisions. The detection of massive numbers of cases of DCIS results in harm from over-treatment of the population with little benefit in terms of reduced mortality from breast cancer. This opinion is echoed by Dr Laura Essermanin a recent JAMA article on the limitations, and disappointing benefits of screening mammography.
Twenty Years of Data
We now have twenty years of breast cancer data during the screening era, and Dr Laura Esserman concludes, the incidence of early stage breast cancer has decreased due to mammography, yet the incidence rates for advanced cancers have not declined as expected. She says:
"One possible explanation is that screening may be increasing the burden of low-risk cancers without significantly reducing the burden of more aggressively growing cancers and therefore not resulting in the anticipated reduction in cancer mortality."
This means we are finding the DCIS cases with mammography, with little impact on overall mortality numbers. In other words, the bulk of our mammography screening efforts are going towards detecting and treating relatively benign lesions which are very common in the population. Critics might call this a fraud and a scam. Our corporate sponsored media calls this good medical care.
Many aggressive cancers are detected clinically between screenings because of rapid growth, making screening superfluous. Some very aggressive cancers, even though detected by screening, are so invasive and aggressive that any form of treatment proves futile.
The Solution, Cancer Prevention With Iodine Supplementation
The discovery of a large reservoir of silent disease is a wake-up call that something is dreadfully wrong. Rather than screen the population for small calcifications, called DCIS, generating massive numbers of lucrative procedures with biopsies and lumpectomies that have little impact on overall mortality, I suggest a better approach.
The evidence is overwhelming that Iodine deficiency causes breast cancer, and Iodine supplementation prevents and treats breast cancer. Iodine supplementation is a less expensive and more effective alternative to the runaway train called mammogram screening. Iodine tablets are available OTC on the internet without a prescription.
For more information on screening mammography see my recent article:
Rethink Pink October Breast Cancer Mammogram by Jeffrey Dach MD
Radiation Exposure Causes BreastCancer (( http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1 ))
Another frequently overlooked problem with screening mammography is the radiation exposure. Radiation is a known carcinogen, and exposing breast tissue to radiation causes breast cancer. Dr Berrington's paper in the 2005 issue of BJC estimated that radiation exposure from screening mammography causes one death for every 2000 women screened. This number is virtually identical to the numbers cited by the US Task Force for lives saved. The US Preventive Task Force estimated that 1,900 women in their 40's would be exposed to 10 years of radiation from mammograms to save one life. This survival benefit equals the mortality from radiation exposure.
Harm From Over-Diagnosis and Unnecessary Biopsies
How do we measure the harm resulting from missed diagnosis, over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment arising from screening mammography? In a BMJ editorial, Dr Gilbert Welch says the following:
One in 1,000 women annually screened for 10 years will avoid dying from breast cancer.
Two to 10 women will be over-diagnosed and treated needlessly.
Ten to 15 women will be told they have breast cancer earlier than they would otherwise have been told, but this will not affect their prognosis.
One Hundred to 500 women will have at least one "false alarm" (about half of these women will undergo a biopsy).
For References and Links see Original Article Here.
Author-Jeffrey Dach MD is a Board Certified Diagnostic Radiologist with 25 years reading mammograms.
Disclaimer: The reader is advised to discuss the comments on these pages with his/her personal physicians and to only act upon the advice of his/her personal physician. Also note that concerning an answer which appears as an electronically posted question, I am NOT creating a physician -- patient relationship. Although identities will remain confidential as much as possible, as I can not control the media, I can not take responsibility for any breaches of confidentiality that may occur.
Author's Website: www.jeffreydach.com
Author's Bio: Jeffrey Dach MD is founder of TrueMedMD a clinic in Hollywood Florida specializing in Bioidentical Hormones, natural medicine, and natural thyroid. Location: .... Hollywood, Florida 33021, telephone 954-983-XXXX www.opednews.com/articles/Mad-Over-Mammogram-Guideli-by-Jeffrey-Dach-091126-560.html
Cancer industry desperately needs mammogram screenings to
Why Mammography is NOT an Effective
Breast Cancer Screen
breast cancer, cancer, mammography, cancer screen, thermography, breast thermographyThe most devastating loss of life from breast cancer occurs between the ages of 30 to 50. Fortunately, you have more options available to you today to help detect breast cancer than in the past decades.
Unfortunately, education and awareness of these options and their effectiveness in detecting breast cancer at different stages in life are woefully deficient.
In the first part of the in-depth article linked below, Beyond Mammography, Dr. Len Saputo explores the latest findings on the effectiveness and shortcomings of various detection methods used by the mainstream medical community, including mammography, clinical breast exams, ultrasound, and to a lesser extent, magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) and PET scans.
The second part goes beyond mammography, exploring a highly advanced but much maligned detection tool for breast cancer -- breast thermography.
Breast thermography, which involves using a heat-sensing scanner to detect variations in the temperature of breast tissue, has been around since the 1960s. However, early infrared scanners were not very sensitive, and were insufficiently tested before being put into clinical practice, resulting in misdiagnosed cases.
Modern-day breast thermography boasts vastly improved technology and more extensive scientific clinical research.
In fact, the article references data from major peer review journals and research on more than 300,000 women who have been tested using the technology. Combined with the successes in detecting breast cancer with greater accuracy than other methods, the technology is slowly gaining ground among more progressive practitioners.
About the Author
Dr. Len Saputo, MD, is a graduate of Duke University Medical
School, and is the Founder and Director of the Health Medicine Forum,
which has hosted and moderated over 350 events. He's also the
Co-founder and Medical Director of the Health Medicine Institute and
Health Medicine Center, and runs a private practice in Internal
Medicine and Health
Sources: Beyond Mammography (pdf) http://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/Beyond.Mammography.pdf
Breast cancer is the second most deadly form of cancer for women in the U.S. Only lung cancer claims more women’s lives than breast cancer.
According to Cancer.org’s latest report, Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2007-2008, 2007 ushered in more than 178,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer, and more than 40,000 women died from the disease.
But men are by no means immune to breast cancer. Just over 2,000 men were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007, and approximately 450 men died. Since routine screening for men is next to nonexistent, men are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease, and therefore have poorer chances for survival.
Unfortunately, conventional medicine is stubbornly holding on to outmoded ideas of cancer detection and treatment, no matter how ineffective it’s been proven to be.
Mammography is a perfect example of this stubborn head-in-the-sand approach to cancer screening. Education and awareness of better, less risky and more effective options for detecting breast cancer are woefully deficient, but they do exist, and it is my hope you will take the time to review this important information, whether you’re a man or a woman, and forward it widely to your family and friends.
The Case Against Mammography
Health officials recommend that all women over 40 get a mammogram every one to two years, yet there is no solid evidence that mammograms save lives, and the benefits of mammograms are controversial at best.
Meanwhile, the health hazards of mammography have been well established.
John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. – a nuclear physicist and a medical doctor, and one of the leading experts in the world on the dangers of radiation – presents compelling evidence in his book, Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease, that over 50 percent of the death-rate from cancer is in fact induced by x-rays.
Now consider the fact that the routine practice of taking four films of each breast annually results in approximately 1 rad (radiation absorbed dose) exposure, which is about 1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray.
Even the American Cancer Society lists high-dose radiation to
the chest as a medium to high risk factor for developing cancer.
X-rays and other classes of ionizing radiation have been, for decades, a proven cause of virtually all types of biological mutations. When such mutations are not cell-lethal, they endure and accumulate with each additional exposure to x-rays or other ionizing radiation.
X-rays are also an established cause of genomic instability, often a characteristic of the most aggressive cancers.
Additionally, radiation risks are about four times greater for the 1 to 2 percent of women who are silent carriers of the A-T (ataxia-telangiectasia) gene, which by some estimates accounts for up to 20 percent of all breast cancers diagnosed annually.
When everything is taken into account, reducing exposure to medical radiation such as unnecessary mammograms would actually likely reduce mortality rates.
The practice of screening mammography itself poses significant and cumulative risks of breast cancer, especially for premenopausal women. ....(...)http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/26/why-mammography-is-not-an-effective-breast-cancer-screen.aspx
Ex-US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson arrested by British MI6 and Interpol and removed to British Overseas Territory of Bermuda on Sunday 13th December 2009.
Paulson now held in custody under British law and within
British jurisdiction. At 3.00pm on Tuesday 15th December 2009, in
Washington DC, current US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was
arrested by international law enforcement authorities, was
voice-and-movement tagged and had his US passport and US driving
licence confiscated. Paulson was running Geithner in his ongoing
sabotage of the lawful delivery of 336,000 prosperity programme packs
in the US.
And more detail on the imminent geopolitical and financial reforms which will follow the near-term collapse of the constitutionally illegal Washington DC private corporation, here (09.12.09) and here (16.12.09).
Yemen becoming battleground for proxy war between US and Saudi Arabia on Arabian peninsula. US policy of eternal war to support illicit drugs trade and stockmarket interests of military-industrial complex takes root in region. On Monday 14th December 2009, seventy civilians were killed when warplanes bombed a market in Bani Maan, northern Yemen. Who did the bombing? Yemeni armed forces say they did. Yemen's Houthi rebels say the US did. Others say that both the US and Saudi Arabia are running conflicting missions.
Yemen's Houthis are anti-Israel, anti Al-Qaeda, anti-Saudi and anti-US.
More here (15.12.09). http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=113812§ionid=351020206
////US jets continue raids in north Yemen Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:11:50 GMT////
Controlled Western mainstream reportage here (BBC 14.12.09):
Tuesday, 15 December 2009
Written,Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 Police State Canada 2010 and the
'In advance of the 2010 Winter Olympics, critics of the Games have been subjected to surveillance, harassment, along with other intimidation tactics. Voicing opposition to the Olympics appears to be all that is needed for one to be labeled as a security threat. There are concerns over the negative impacts associated with holding the Games, as well as concerted efforts to stifle anti-Olympic expression.
As the Coca-Cola/RBC corporate torch relay nears its final destination, the opening ceremonies in Vancouver on February 12, 2010, more protests are expected. The Olympics are providing the perfect cover for many police state measures with ramifications that could leave a lasting legacy. http://beyourownleader.blogspot.com/2009/12/police-state-canada-2010-and-olympic.html be-your-own-leader
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
At least 120 Houthis have lost lives and 44 others sustained injuries as US fighter jets took part in air strikes in the northwestern Yemeni province of Sa'ada. "The US air force perpetrated an appalling massacre against citizens in the north of Yemen as it launched air raids on various populated areas, markets, refugee camps and villages along with Saudi warplanes," the northern Yemen-based Houthi Shia fighters said.
They added, "The savage crime committed by the US air force shows the real face of the United States. It cancels out much touted American claims of human rights protection, promotion of freedoms of citizens as well as democracy".'
* 'US fighter jets attack Yemeni fighters'
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
Normally, I stay away from scary movies, but I couldn't resist going to the world premiere of a terrifying documentary called "Full Signal" last week at the Santa Fe Film Festival. No blood, no Gore, just the electrifying truth. There are an estimated 4 billion cell phone users around the world, and that number is rapidly increasing. To give us the kind of connection we all crave, thousands and thousands of cell phone towers and antennas have been built and — as filmmaker Talal Jabari documents — hidden from view on rooftops and behind trees, disguised as chimneys and church spires, and kept as far under the regulatory radar as possible.
The problem is the electromagnetic field—the EMFs—created by all this constant connectivity disrupt our own normal cell activity and wind up making some of us very sick. Can you hear me? Cancer? Alzheimer's? Brain tumors? Autism? Fertility impairment? Hormone disruptions? The list of health problems linked to EMF exposure and documented in "Full Signal" goes on and on, locally and globally, with more and more scientists, researchers and citizen activists from around the world sounding the alarm.'
...(...) The meltdown effect of wireless technology on your well-being depends on your individual sensitivity and your exposure level.
"It is generally not appreciated that there is a cumulative effect (on our bodies) and that talking on the cell phone for an hour a day for 10 years can add up to 10,000 watts of radiation. That's 10 times more than you get from putting your head in a microwave oven," says Dr. Paul Rosch, clinical professor of medicine and psychology at the New York Medical College.
Help! My ears are ringing. "A two-minute call can alter brain function in a child for an hour," he says, "which is why other countries ban their sale or discourage their use under age 18." Age 18? That's certainly not the American way. We're starting kids out with Barbie phones at age 8. See how CTB (Cell Technology Breakdown) has already affected our collective brains?
"There is no question EMFs (electromagnetic fields) have a major effect on neurological functioning," writes brain researcher Eric Braverman, M.D. a contributor to the very juicy Electromagetichealth.com Website.
"They (EMFs) slow our brain waves and affect our long-term mental clarity.We should minimize exposure as much as possible to optimize neurotransmitter levels and prevent deterioration of health."
Deterioration of health. That's where I came into the picture, sitting through the world premiere of "Full Signal," wishing it were clearer, sharper, better, but very happy to know it's available and part of an ongoing campaign to raise awareness.
Can you hear me now? Alarming numbers of people — children are most vulnerable—are getting sick, not just here in the U.S. but in hot spots around the globe. This isn't speculation anymore. It is science, say the public health doctors and researchers Talal Jabari interviewed in eight countries and six U.S. cities. He's a former "60Minutes" producer and really did his homework.
I urge you to start doing your own homework. Meanwhile ... 1) Power down whenever you can; 2) use the speaker or a non-transmitting ear device; 3) take the wireless phone out of your bedroom; 4) don't let your community deteriorate into a toxic soup of EMFs.
Hello? Are you still there?
******Marilynn Preston is the creator of Energy Express, the longest-running syndicated fitness column in the country. She has a website, http://marilynnpreston.com (( http://www.marilynnpreston.com/bio.html )) and welcomes reader questions, which can be sent to MyEnergyExpress@...........
Friday, 11 December 2009
'The Optimum Population Trust (OPT), a UK-based "think tank" and registered charity, has launched a new initiaqtive urging wealthy members of the developed world to participate in carbon offsets that fund programs for curbing the population of developing nations. The scheme is being promoted as a more cost-effective way to reduce CO2 emissions than investing in alternative energy sources and offers a way for elitist racists to feel ethical in their quest to exterminate the third world masses.'...One patron of the Optimum Population Trust who stands out is Jonathon Porritt, a well-known baronet and a green campaigner who advises the likes of Prince Charles on environmental matters. He has long argued the link between "environmental sustainability" and enforced abortions.
... (...) Another prominent OPT patron is Paul Ehrlich, George W. Bush's chief science advisor and co-author (with his wife, Anne, and Obama's science advisor, John P. Holdren) of Ecoscience, a 1977 textbook that outlined in painstaking detail the various measures that the governments of the world could take to confront the "problem" of population, from forced abortions and one-child policies to mass sterilization of the populace through the contamination of the water supply....(..)
With such patrons in its ranks, it is hardly surprising that the group would endose a plan to sterilize the poor in the name of reducing carbon emissions. Of course, the green rhetoric of "sustainability" and "carbon reduction" is only the latest garb for a very old ideology, eugenics, a 19th century junk science which concluded that the human race consisted of genetically "superior" and "inferior" breeds. Unsurprisingly, this long-since discredited hucksterism, invented by an inbred group of British gentlemen scientists concluded that inbred British gentlemen scientists were the master race and everyone else was expendable.
When the Jewish holocaust exposed the eugenics cult for the genocidal ideology that it is, the once-thriving eugenics societies had to go underground. Some did this by merely changing their name: the British Eugenics Society became the Galton Institute in 1989, for example. Others changed their focus. The American Eugenics Society morphed into the Population Council, a group formed by John D. Rockefeller III, and refocused its attention on the problem of overpopulation and sustainability. Under the cloak of "scientific" research into the discredited Matlhusian bunkum of overpopulation. In latter years, this merged quite nicely with the now discredited junk science of "manmade global warming" to provide a perfect front for the eugenicists.
If any further evidence were needed that the green rhetoric of carbon offsets were merely another front for the rabidly racist ideology of eugenics, perhaps the clearest indication can be found on the Galton Institute home page. Here, the group that once openly called itself a eugencis society brags that one of its main functions is to serve as a funding vehicle for Marie Stopes International, an organization whose founder was a rabid racist who advocated sterilization of non-whites and the poor. And the eugenicist's agenda rolls on...
Friday, 11 December 2009
The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday
The UK National ‘Health Service (NHS) is introducing a policy of withdrawing food, fluid and treatment once the close-to-death judgement has been made to put them on what they call the ‘death pathway’.The patient is also fed sedative drugs continually until death
which can mask the fact that their state of health has improved.
Professor Peter Millard, Emeritus Professor of Geriatrics, University of London, and Dr Peter Hargreaves, a consultant in Palliative Medicine at St Luke’s cancer centre in Guildford, are among many doctors who are extremely concerned at what is happening.
They say that patients are being diagnosed as being close to death ‘without regard to the fact that the diagnosis could be wrong’. Dr Hargreaves said that some patients were being wrongly put on the ‘pathway’, which created a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’ that they would die.
He said that he had personally taken patients off the pathway who went on to live for ‘significant’ amounts of time and warned that many doctors were not checking the progress of patients enough to notice improvement in their condition.
‘I have been practising palliative medicine for more than 20 years and I am getting more concerned about this 'death pathway' that is coming in’, he said.
Hazel Fenton, an 80-year-old British grandmother, had her drugs and food stopped under this ‘scheme’ when doctors said she had days to live and yet nine months later she was still alive after her outraged daughter, Christine Ball, fought with doctors
for four days to have the drugs and food restored.
A nurse even asked Christine what she wanted to do with her mother’s body. Christine was exactly right when she said: ‘My mother was going to be left to starve and dehydrate to death. It really is a subterfuge for legalised euthanasia of the elderly ...’
It is indeed the drip, drip, drip.... to forced euthanasia.
(( *maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller*
Friday, 11 December 2009
'Diane Francis, writing for Canada’s Financial Post, begins an editorial by declaring a myth — the world is over-populated. “The ‘inconvenient truth’ overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world,” she writes. http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438 “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.” An interesting choice of words. Planetary law. In other words, a world government with the power to decide if humans are allowed to procreate. Currently we do not have such a world government.
Behind the scenes at Copenhagen, however, the powerbrokers are working feverishly to establish the sort of world government only partially imagined by Ms. Francis.'
Kurt Nimmo Infowars December 10, 2009
...(...) The elite realized a big victory when they anointed the Bilderberg and Trilateral commission member Herman Van Rompuy as the “permanent” (and unelected) president of the European Union. Van Rompuy declared 2009 the “first year of global governance” and said Copenhagen is “another step towards the global management of our planet.”
It is also interesting that Francis cited China’s notorious one-child policy as the desired template. The totalitarian rulers of China have enforced a one-child policy since 1979. It is modern eugenics in practice.
“China currently has Galton-era eugenics laws on the books which only allow pre-approved couples to marry and have children,” writes Daniel Taylor. “The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care states that if the approved couples children are deemed to be inferior they are to be terminated.”
China’s draconian eugenics program is supported the Rockefellers, a clan of infamous eugenicists. The Washington Post reported on October 12, 2000 that the Rockefeller Foundation had donated two million dollars to upgrade a Chinese drug factory that produces the abortion drug RU-486. “RU-486 has been a key ingredient in China’s population control strategy for years. Of the estimated 10 million abortions performed annually in China, about half are carried out with RU-486, said Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research,” the CIA’s favorite newspaper reported.
The globalist United Nations — soon to be cast off as useless (it was revealed this week in Copenhagen) — is largely responsible for fostering China’s one-child policy.
China’s brutal totalitarian rulers base their Malthusian depopulation program on Mao Zedong’s reading of Marxist theory on population growth, an idea Marx took from Thomas Malthus. The British economist argued in favor of “positive checks” on population. Positive checks are those, according to Thomas Malthus, that increase the death rate, specifically disease, war, disaster, and finally, when other checks are ineffective, famine.
Of course, when Malthus formulated his macabre philosophy in 1798, the modern totalitarian dictatorship had yet to come into existence.
Mao was a master at eliminating humans he deemed either inferior or belonging to the wrong social class. Mao, like Stalin, killed more people than Hitler. Unlike the mass murder campaign in the Soviet Union that began years after the October Revolution, Mao started killing people almost immediately after taking power. He starved millions to death under a forced agricultural collectivization program. Mao considered these collectivized farms too individualistic, so he forced millions of peasants into communes where family life, traditions, personal property and privacy, personal initiative and individual freedom were drummed out of the victims.
The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia would later attempt to follow Mao’s lead and killed more than 20% of the population under the rule of Pol Pot.
Mao’s so-called Great Leap Forward in industrialization killed at least 30 million Chinese, mostly through famine. A few years later, Mao launched his Cultural Revolution and purged and executed large numbers of Communist Party members and intellectuals. The Cultural Revolution killed an additional 10-15 million.
China’s so-called communist rulers continued Mao’s brutal policies after his death. In 1989 the government engaged in the methodical murder of an estimated 2,000-3,000 demonstrators in Tiananmen Square. Others have put the number at over 12,000. However, the murderous zeal of Mao has waned in China. Political criminals are no longer killed in large numbers. Instead, political criminals are sent to “re-education” camps and exploited as state-owned assets (an undetermined number of these state assets are harvested for their internal organs).
“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose,” a praiseful David Rockefeller has gushed (New York Times, August 10, 1973). “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”
Rockefeller and the New World Order gang are chomping at the bit to bring Mao’s lessons to Europe and especially America where “high morale and community of purpose” need to be inflicted on a population that still remembers, however vaguely, the example of Jefferson and Madison.
Part of the plan is to drastically scale back the population through eugenics. The “recalibration” of humanity Diane Francis writes about so glowingly in her editorial published by the Financial Times on December 8 is well underway in the form of genetically modified food, a systematic poisoning of the population through water and product fluoridation, and degradation of the environment through industrial and military pollution (which the Ford and Rockefeller foundation environmentalists ignore in favor of the contrived scam they call “climate change,” formerly global warming before it was revealed as a scientifically disprovable fallacy).
The New World Order will ultimately have no use for Ms. Francis or the rest of us, who are considered interlopers and trespassers on a planet they consider their property.
///Be prepared Comment Rules////
121 Responses to “Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global.......
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
'Aside from the most important environmental issues, population control has also been discussed at the Copenhagen climate summit. More and more governments are looking into a policy similar to that of China (a policy according to which a family is only allowed to have one child) as a possible solution to problems such as overpopulation.
We do not hear too much about China here in the states and reports on this one child policy. So, I thought I would provide you all with some research links, facts and the cold reality of how China treats humans. China’s one-child policy spawns secret slaughter: Vast exercise in social engineering proves lethal to millions of girls and puts the population out of balance
MILLIONS of baby girls are believed to have been quietly put to death in China as a result of its rigid ‘one-child’ policy of population control. In male- dominated rural areas, the pressure to have a son is so strong that girls often disappear shortly after birth, giving parents another chance to ensure their only child is a boy.
Now peasant tradition has found a modern reinforcement – pre-natal scanning. In one rural township where parents have been able to discover the sex of their children in the womb, more than three boys are being born for every two girls. The Communist Party committee in Zaozhuang, in the northern province of Shandong, has warned that officials who have used scanning to detect and abort female babies will be stripped of their posts and membership.
Obtaining evidence of this secret slaughter has never been easy, except for the growing disparity in population statistics.
This week, I reported that China was in Copenhagen, Denmark with a mission to push their one child policies on the world: ...(...)
Keep in mind that China is a communist country and this baby killing advice is coming from a land where pollution kills 750,000 in China every year. Apparently carbon emitting and polluting factories that produce toys and clothes for the world in slave factories are more valued than human lives....(...) Yesterday, I reported on the inhumane act of using aborted human fetuses in soup and other Chinese dishes that is currently accepted and legal in China: Dead babies can be purchased in Taiwan for 70 US dollars for being used as grilled delicacies.- Seoul Times
An Email report received by The Seoul Times confirmed that news with several vivid and appalling pictures of human embryos fetuses being made into a soup for human consumption.
The report went on. A town in the southern province of Canton (Guangdong) is now on trend taking baby herbal soup to increase overall health and stamina and the power of sexual performance in particular....(...) So who in the West wants to bring the people under China’s forced abortion, one child policy? Well, lets take a look.
According to Diane Francis (a Canadian journalist who is recommending such measures), the world’s population would be reduced from 6.5 billion to 3.43 billion by 2075. She called it an inconvenient truth that we all need to accept and called kids carbon emmiting units: ...(...) The “Case for Killing Junior” has just begun and I am afraid that the ruling class who control every facet of our society are hell bent on leading the West down this hellish path. Apparently they are our Bad Shepard’s and we are the sheep.
**** About Moe Bedard I am the founder of LoanSafe.org, LoanWorkout.org and CEO of MoeSeo Inc. My work has been featured in the New York Times, LA Times, Fox Business and many other media publications. My goal is to help people with my websites and restore hope through the internet. I was born and raised in Southern California and currently reside in Temecula, California with my wife and five children.
* China's Solution for Global Warming: Kill
the Children & Executions
Dec 16, 2009 9:48 AM British Admit: Copenhagen Is All About Genocide
Lyndon LaRouche written,Dec. 12, 2009
December 13, 2009 (LPAC)—The official British policy for the Copenhagen conference is now out, in explicit language: Massive population genocide, on a scale that would make Adolf Hitler blush. The London School of Economics, the anchor of the Fabian Gordon Brown government, has produced a study for Copenhagen, released by the British organization Optimum Population Trust (OPT), calling for the reduction of world population by between three to five billion people between now and 2050. This flagrant call for mass extermination is based on the argument that the single greatest cause of global warming is over-population, and that the most "cost-effective" cure for global warming
is radical population reduction.
According to a recent OPT study, the so-called global warming crisis can be solved, most cheaply, by reducing the world population by 500 million between now and 2050. Since linear population projections put world population at well-over 9 billion by that date, the proposal to cut back world population to just over 6 billion people, would mean the elimination of 3 billion people. Indeed, an OPT press release, dated March 16, 2009, titled "Earth Heading for 5 Billion Overpopulation?" reported, "Based on ecological footprint and biolgoical capacity data which have become available over the last decade, OPT estimates the world's sustainable population currently at 5 billion and the U.K.'s at 18 million (the U.K.'s actual current population is 61 million).
"However," the release continued, "these figures are predicated on present levels and patterns of consumption. Greener lifestyles in the U.K. could push up its sustainable population; by contrast, if the world as a whole grows richer and consumes more, this will reduce the planet's carrying capacity. If present trends continue, by 2050, when the UN projects world population will be 9.1 billion, there will be an estimated 5 billion more people than the Earth can support."
A later OPT report, prepared for Copenhagen, called "Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost," spelled out London's solution: Place population reduction at the top of the agenda. OPT "called on climate change negotiators to ensure that population restraint policies are adopted by every state worldwide to combat climate change."
The UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund, gave its de facto blessing to this mass murder scheme on Nov. 18, when they featured Optimum Population Trust director Roger Martin, as a presenter of the UN's own "State of World Population 2009" report, a document geared to the now-ongoing Copenhagen conference on global warming. While the UN report, itself, makes the same link between global warming and population growth, it is the OPT study and its "Pop Offsets" program of targeted population reduction in the world's poorest countries, that defines the true London agenda at Copenhagen.
It is the agenda spelled out, repeatedly, by the Royal Consort Prince Philip, for decades: Reduce the world population by 80 percent, create a global feudal dictatorship,
eliminating the nation-state system altogether.
Climat : Meadows annonce les objectifs, pas plus de 2 milliards d’humains. Alors qu’à Copenhague le lobby anti-population peine à pousser les nations au suicide, l’un de ses plus loyaux valets, l’expert en ingénierie sociale du MIT, Dennis Meadows, annonce ouvertement les objectifs de la fraude du réchauffement climatique : réduire la population mondiale à 2 milliards d’individus. Meadows joua un rôle fondamental au commencement de cette propagande malthusienne, puisqu’il est le co-auteur du rapport du Club de Rome Halte à la croissance, de 1972 (plus justement surnommé Halte à l’intelligence).
Copenhague : Annulons le sommet de la dépopulation ! 3 décembre 2009 - 17:33
Après avoir sacrifié l’économie physique sur l’autel des marchés financiers, l’heure est venue pour les cartels financiers de Londres et Wall Street d’« adapter » la taille de la population mondiale à leur système en contraction. Tel est le véritable objectif du Sommet de Copenhague sur le "Climat". .....Seule l’annulation brutale du Sommet peut envoyer un signal fort d’un retour à la raison....(..) Robert Engelman n’est pas un employé de l’ONU, mais le directeur du World Watch Institute fondé en 1974 par Lester Brown et grâce aux largesses de la fondation Rockefeller. Pur produit des élites financières anglo-américaines (Institut Aspen, Council on Foreign Relations), Lester Brown est un fanatique avoué du Révérend Thomas Malthus, celui qui promouvait les thèses anti-population de l’Empire britannique au XIXe siècle. ..(...)
Pour les malthusiens et autres eugénistes, une bonne politique de santé est un véritable cauchemar. En effet, c’est là où l’homme, en mettant à contribution la science et la technologie, augmente le potentiel démographique relatif de son espèce. Aux Etats-Unis, Daniel Callahan est l’un des rares vétérans du mouvement malthusien et eugéniste. Il vient de publier un manifeste visant à convaincre l’administration Obama d’adopter une politique suicidaire et fasciste en mettant un terme au progrès médical pour tous.
Callahan est le dirigeant et cofondateur du Hastings Center,
centre de recherche en bioéthique situé à
Garrison, dans l’Etat de NewYork. Au nombre des chercheurs de ce centre
figure EzekielEmanuel, le conseiller le plus influent de BarackObama
dans le domaine de la santé et principal architecte de sa
« réforme »....(...) [*] Copenhague doit aussi
être un grand moment pour tous les spéculateurs de la
planète, tel le gérant de hedge-fund vert qu’est Al Gore,
en redonnant un coup de fouet au marché mondial du carbone. L’un
des objectifs revendiqués est, en effet, d’accroître
sérieusement les objectifs de réduction de CO2 afin de gonfler le prix des
droits d’émission qui circulent sur les marchés
financiers, et dont veut se gaver Al Gore. http://www.solidariteetprogres.org/sp_depopulation.php
L’histoire de l’humanité est celle de révolutions successives dans notre compréhension et la transformation de la nature. Cesser de s’identifier à cette capacité serait cessé d’être humain.
C’est pourtant ce que martèle les médias à longueur de temps, et toute une panoplie de projets décroissants, plus ou moins soft, mais tous fondés sur la gestion d’un monde fini condamné à l’épuisement. Ce qui s’est épuisé chez les nouveaux chantres de l’automutilation, c’est la confiance instruite en notre capacité de découvrir sans cesse des principes physiques nouveaux, des potentiels de la nature que nous ignorions, créant tout autant de ressources jusqu’alors inexistante.
On vous dit que vous êtes responsables de tous les maux
de la terre, notamment du « réchauffement climatique
». On vous ment pour mettre en place des politiques
anti-humaines. Jugez-en par vous-même....(...) http://www.solidariteetprogres.org/sp_Dossier_RechauffementClimatique.php
Currently it may be used as a label for those who are concerned that overpopulation may increase resource depletion or environmental degradation to a degree that is not sustainable with the potential of ecological collapse or other hazards.
17 décembre 2009 Norway Spiral UFO: Failed Missile? Or Successful demonstration? Clif High interview explains theory.
L'excuse bidon de l'armée russe sur le lancement raté d'une fusée ne tient pas la route et démontre la 'couverture oficielle' de cet évènement. Le tracé bleu qui rejoint le sol n'est pas celui d'une fusée. C'est plutôt la démonstration du pouvoir militaire de la Russie le jour où Obama recevait son prix Nobel de la paix. Ils ont en main une arme semblable à HAARP capable de créer un trou noir électromagnétique. Jouer avec l'éther.
Webbot Clif High talks about Norway Spiral on Jeff Rense Show
Web bot linguistics expert Clif High talks about the Norway Spiral as being involved with HAARP and possibly connected with the climate change meetings in Copenhagen.
Visit our webbot forum at: http://www.maya12-21-2012.com/webbot
or our spirituality/metaphyscal/2012 forum at: http://maya12-21-2012.com/2012forum/
Spiral Light Vortex Over Norway With Cliff High
Just over the hill from where this occurred, lies a high-tech Norwegian "HAARP antenna farm" -- the EISCAT Ramfjordmoen facility
go to islandonlinenews.com to get the full story. http://www.islandonlinenews.com/
17 Dec 2009 BUSH SR CONTINUES TO SABOTAGE THE SETTLEMENTS
16 Dec 2009 TREASURY
SECRETARY ‘READ HIS RIGHTS’ AND TAGGED
26 Nov 2009 THE FINANCING
OF AL-QAEDA BY U.S. INTELLIGENCE
30 Oct 2009 GERMAN ARRESTS MASK MAJOR BUSH SYNDICATE BUST
....etc......///// ....from: http://www.worldreports.org/news
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Ken6@Ken-Welch.Com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com